Mayflower District Court
#natestratt-v-parkrangerbilly
This is the start of #natestratt-v-parkrangerbilly channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-09-27 07:50 p.m.
honkhonk 2025-03-18 01:21 a.m.
Honorable Judge acerxtro presiding.
Counsel for the plaintiff:@huddy.
Counsel for the plaintiff:
honkhonk used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-18 01:21 a.m. @honkhonk has added @huddy. to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:47 a.m.
CC looks good @huddy.
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:47 a.m.
Can someone serve defendant @General Staff
jackg1 2025-03-21 01:47 a.m.
im gonna touch you
jackg1 2025-03-21 01:47 a.m.
Your Honor
Evexom used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-21 01:47 a.m. @Evexom has removed @jackg1 from the case channel.
Case Modified
jackg1 2025-03-21 01:47 a.m.
Lawl
Evexom 2025-03-21 01:47 a.m.
Okay
jackg1 2025-03-21 01:47 a.m.
I permeate
acerxtroCan someone serve defendant @General Staff
Brenda Cornwallis 2025-03-21 01:48 a.m.
pls use the clerkflow bot
Brenda Cornwallis 2025-03-21 01:48 a.m.
to serve
jackg1 2025-03-21 01:48 a.m.
^
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:48 a.m.
acerxtro used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-21 03:01 a.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @billy (disabled account) (edited)
acerxtro used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-21 03:02 a.m. Wednesday, March 26, 2025 at 3:02 a.m. (7 months ago )
Timer
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-21 11:48 a.m. @acerxtro has added @billy (disabled account) to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:49 a.m.@billy (disabled account) Hello welcome you are being sued 
1
1acerxtro
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-21 12:02 p.m.
4
Will you be my friend please
4
huddy. 2025-03-25 02:49 p.m.@acerxtro Can you set a response timeframe??
huddy. 2025-03-25 02:49 p.m.
It's been a week minus three days
BotclerkFlowClick to see command.
acerxtro 2025-03-25 03:04 p.m.@billy (disabled account) HEY TIME IS ALMOST UP
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 03:12 p.m.
hi
BotclerkFlowClick to see command.
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 03:12 p.m.
timer for what
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 03:12 p.m.@acerxtro
billy (disabled account)timer for what
acerxtro 2025-03-25 03:34 p.m.
u have to submit a response to his allegations
acerxtro 2025-03-25 03:34 p.m.
or have a lawyer do that for u
acerxtro 2025-03-25 03:34 p.m.
or he automatically wins
acerxtrou have to submit a response to his allegations
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 03:55 p.m.
you should have informed me what the time was meant for
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 03:56 p.m.
you started the time a day before I was even added to the channel
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 03:56 p.m.
im not even aware of what his allegations are
billy (disabled account)you should have informed me what the time was meant for
acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:04 p.m.
it tells you in the bot DM
acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:04 p.m.
do you need an extension on the response
acerxtroit tells you in the bot DM
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:06 p.m.
i dont really have any info on this case
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:07 p.m.
and i want an extension
billy (disabled account)and i want an extension
acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:19 p.m.
how many days
billy (disabled account)i dont really have any info on this case
acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:20 p.m.
you allegedly dropped someone off a bridge iirc
acerxtrohow many days
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:22 p.m.
2
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:22 p.m.
im trying to find a lawyer
billy (disabled account)im trying to find a lawyer
acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:24 p.m.
you may be able to have @Nicklaus represent you since you are being sued as an LEO(edited)
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:27 p.m.@acerxtro im trying to get Hamilton & Wexler to repersent me
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:28 p.m.
lol nvm
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:28 p.m.
they are sueing me
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 04:30 p.m.@acerxtro OK @Dark Stranger CAN REPERSENT ME : /
billy (disabled account)they are sueing me
acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:34 p.m.
LOL
billy (disabled account)acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:34 p.m.
Ok
acerxtro 2025-03-25 04:34 p.m.@Dark Stranger hey file NOA
billy (disabled account)huddy. 2025-03-25 05:00 p.m.
bud
huddy.bud
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-25 05:19 p.m.
smiles at u
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-25 10:31 p.m. @acerxtro has added @Dark Stranger to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-03-25 10:31 p.m.
Hi @Dark Stranger
acerxtroHi @Dark Stranger
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 04:01 a.m.
Hlo
huddy. 2025-03-26 01:07 p.m.
Howdy @acerxtro
huddy. 2025-03-26 01:07 p.m.
acerxtro 2025-03-27 01:47 p.m.@Dark Stranger eta on response to cc
acerxtroDark Stranger 2025-03-27 01:48 p.m.
2 days your honor, I have my exams starting tmrw, I will review this cases and write response after my exam tmrw
Dark Stranger2 days your honor, I have my exams starting tmrw, I will review this cases and write response after my exam tmrw
acerxtro 2025-03-27 01:49 p.m.
not a second longer
acerxtro used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-27 01:49 p.m. Saturday, March 29, 2025 at 1:49 p.m. (7 months ago )
Timer
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:03 p.m.
Your Honor, the Plaintiff is just buying time because he is unprepared and is lying to the court - we move you to cancel your extension
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:03 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:03 p.m.
Repeatedly lied about this in another case - even if all this was true, his alleged 'semester' would have already ended
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:03 p.m.@Dark Stranger Tell the truth for once will you
huddy.Repeatedly lied about this in another case - even if all this was true, his alleged 'semester' would have already ended
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:04 p.m.
Brother
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:04 p.m.
there is a final exam after semester ends
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:05 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:05 p.m.
Keep capping bud
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:05 p.m.
You already pulled this excuse
huddy.Repeatedly lied about this in another case - even if all this was true, his alleged 'semester' would have already ended
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:05 p.m.
I never lied about anything. It is not my fault that you don't want to believe
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:05 p.m.
At least find another
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:05 p.m.
Brothe
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:06 p.m.
You can believe what ever you want
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:06 p.m.
Don't take cases if you have 'exams'
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:06 p.m.
all you are is a hinderance to the judicial process
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:06 p.m.
everywhere I go you want extensions
huddy.Don't take cases if you have 'exams'
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:06 p.m.
I don't need your advice thankyou
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:07 p.m.
You clearly do lmfao 
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:11 p.m.@acerxtro I think you need to teach him the "How not to be an asshole" part of the law school
huddy.You clearly do lmfao
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-27 09:05 p.m.
Will you be my friend please :/
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-27 09:05 p.m.
No one wants to be my friend
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-27 09:05 p.m.
Everyone hates me
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-27 09:05 p.m.
:/
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-27 09:05 p.m.
No one wants to talk to me
Dark Strangeracerxtro 2025-03-27 10:41 p.m.
focus on the response
Dark Stranger 2025-03-29 06:45 a.m.
The Defendant denies all the allegations, Your Honor.
CC:@acerxtro @huddy.
Dark StrangerThe Defendant denies all the allegations, Your Honor. CC: @acerxtro @huddy.
acerxtro 2025-03-29 10:04 a.m.
insufficient response
acerxtro 2025-03-29 10:04 a.m.
fix within 4h
acerxtroinsufficient response
Dark Stranger 2025-03-29 10:05 a.m.
You want it in writting ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-29 10:05 a.m.
on a doc ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-29 10:38 a.m.@acerxtro What you want exactly ????
huddy. 2025-03-29 01:49 p.m.@acerxtro Defense counsel has failed to provide a response within the original time allowed, and then failed to submit in the generous extra 48 hours allowed for by you
huddy. 2025-03-29 01:49 p.m.
We move the court to rule on our motion for default judgement
Dark Strangeracerxtro 2025-03-29 03:41 p.m.
see rules of procedure
acerxtrosee rules of procedure
Dark Stranger 2025-03-29 03:41 p.m.
I've seen many other judges accept that so do you want it on paper ?
Dark StrangerI've seen many other judges accept that so do you want it on paper ?
acerxtro 2025-03-29 03:42 p.m.
see rules of procedure
huddy. 2025-03-29 03:45 p.m.
Defense counsel is expected to know that
huddy. 2025-03-29 03:45 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-03-29 03:45 p.m.
Ignorance is no excuse
Dark Stranger 2025-03-29 03:58 p.m.
If yes then I will upload it using the bot
billy (disabled account) 2025-03-29 11:01 p.m.
Will you be my friend
huddy. 2025-03-30 03:56 p.m.@acerxtro When may we expect a ruling on our motion? Defense has failed to submit a valid response within the 48 hours and not a second longer
Dark Strangeracerxtro 2025-03-30 04:42 p.m.
Any objection @huddy.
acerxtroAny objection @huddy.
huddy. 2025-03-31 03:15 a.m.
Absolutely.
Firstly, Defendant failed to provide this within the original timeframe.
Secondly, you allowed an additional 48 hours and'not a second longer' , yet Defendant still failed to provide this within that timeframe.
Thirdly, it's labelled and titled'CV-118-25' despite this being 'CV-0139' and is labelled and titled 'Plaintiff Discovery' . Defendant is clearly confused and this is the wrong case for that filing.
Finally, Defendant has failed to respond to he Jurisdiction & Venue section of the Civil Complaint, making his complaing incomplete and invalid.
Firstly, Defendant failed to provide this within the original timeframe.
Secondly, you allowed an additional 48 hours and
Thirdly, it's labelled and titled
Finally, Defendant has failed to respond to he Jurisdiction & Venue section of the Civil Complaint, making his complaing incomplete and invalid.
huddy. 2025-03-31 03:18 a.m.
response*
acerxtro 2025-03-31 03:53 a.m.
this is truly heartbreaking
acerxtro 2025-03-31 03:54 a.m.@billy (disabled account) the plaintiff won automatically because your lawyer did not submit the correct document properly
acerxtro 2025-03-31 03:54 a.m.
what does this mean? ill see what you have to do soon
acerxtro 2025-03-31 03:54 a.m.
but you can appeal this case with the help of another attorney
acerxtroDark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:40 a.m.
Your Honor
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:40 a.m.
I have no clue what counsel is taking about
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:40 a.m.
I have given the correct documents
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:41 a.m.
And the late was because I was not sure what exactly you wanted
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:42 a.m.Need a trusty, steadfast, reliable lawyer on who you can depend on! is crazy lmfao
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:42 a.m.
Can you stop being an asshole for once ?
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:42 a.m.
Not even being able to depend on your counsel to file a standard civil response within 48 hours is absurd
huddy.Not even being able to depend on your counsel to file a standard civil response within 48 hours is absurd
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:43 a.m.
I believe I was asking the Judge and not your opinion, so please stop speaking when not required
Dark StrangerI have no clue what counsel is taking about
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:44 a.m.
’I have no clue what counsel is talking a out’ (proceeds to argue against a statement stated by the Judge and not counsel
huddy.acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:44 a.m.
ok let's not go into personal attacks
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:45 a.m.
this is not the time or place for that
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:45 a.m.
Alr just pointing that out
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:45 a.m.
that was inappropriate, even though it put a smile on my face
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:45 a.m.
But don’t claim I’ve said something when I haven’t @Dark Stranger tha ma
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:45 a.m.
that is why Mr. @Dark Stranger is a student at MSU:LAW and why you are a seasoned attorney
huddy.But don’t claim I’ve said something when I haven’t @Dark Stranger tha ma
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:46 a.m."Thirdly, it's labelled and titled 'CV-118-25' despite this being 'CV-0139' and is labelled and titled 'Plaintiff Discovery'. Defendant is clearly confused and this is the wrong case for that filing. "
Dark Stranger*"Thirdly, it's labelled and titled 'CV-118-25' despite this being 'CV-0139' and is labelled and titled 'Plaintiff Discovery'. Defendant is clearly confused and this is the wrong c...
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:46 a.m.
I’ve control f’d to this message and I can’t find the words ‘incorrect document’
acerxtrothat is why Mr. @Dark Stranger is a student at MSU:LAW and why you are a seasoned attorney
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:46 a.m.
Wow, now the Judge is also going for personal attacks, what a great court
Dark StrangerWow, now the Judge is also going for personal attacks, what a great court
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:47 a.m.
you can go into a personal cell in the county jail if you continue twisting my words
Dark StrangerWow, now the Judge is also going for personal attacks, what a great court
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:47 a.m.
Stating a fact is such a personal attack am I right
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:47 a.m.
especially when I try to fight a battle for you
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:47 a.m.
’saying that a higher proportion of blacks than whites go to jail is racist’ ahh response
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:47 a.m.
Right
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:47 a.m.
i shall cease mb
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:48 a.m.
I was seconds into informing the members of this courtroom that I was inclined to show mercy to the poor defendant here who is caught up in the midst of all this
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:48 a.m.
but I am reconsidering
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:48 a.m.
I do believe this Court has the ability to accept late pleadings prior to the official entry of default
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:48 a.m.@huddy. What about this btw ? When you actually filled a document with wrong case number inside and out ? 
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:48 a.m.
Remain silent @Dark Stranger
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:49 a.m.
I am holding your redemption ticket out on a gold platter and you are looking in the bin
Dark Strangerhuddy. 2025-03-31 04:49 a.m.
Perfect argument. @acerxtro rule against me immediately in favour of this sound argument!!!
acerxtroespecially when I try to fight a battle for you
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 04:49 a.m.
Your Honor, I apologies that I misinterpret your message
acerxtroI do believe this Court has the ability to accept late pleadings prior to the official entry of default
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:50 a.m.
Right but the pleading is missing parts and you did state ‘not a second longer’ for your extension
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:50 a.m.
And even so, the response is flawed and incomplete
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:50 a.m.
Defendant hasn’t admitted or denied jurisdiction
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:51 a.m.
It would appear there is an error in our great rules of procedure
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:51 a.m.
Anyway
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:52 a.m.
The Court is willing to accept another response under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37(c)
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:52 a.m.
after it converses with Mr. @billy (disabled account)
huddy.Right but the pleading is missing parts and you did state ‘not a second longer’ for your extension
acerxtro 2025-03-31 04:53 a.m.
This Court is not a punk and does wish to impose sanctions, but does not wish to do so upon the client for actions out of their control
huddy. 2025-03-31 04:56 a.m.
True that. I shall stop talking, but we move for Darkstranger_000 to be held in contempt and his actions made aware to the Defendant so that he may be removed as counsel and quit jeapordizing his client and holding up these proceedings. A defendant should be fully aware of their lawyer’s capabilities and competency, as they entrust them with their entire representations, as outlined in their Notice of Appearance
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:01 a.m.
The Court will not hold Mr. DarkStranger_000 in contempt, mostly due to his status as a law student and his willingness to continue learning the law. I am in no hurry to discourage or demoralize individuals from practicing law, especially so early on in their career; but the Court will admonish and verbally reprimand the counselor for their conduct, particularly their attempts to twist the words of the honorable judge present and to sneak a snarky remark in. Mistakes will happen, and the Court will work through them when possible, so long as all parties continue to remain cordial and compliant with the Court's attempts. This is not to be construed as allowing attorneys to make egregious mistakes and walk scott-free, nor to allow the violation of the rights of citizens of this state under the guise of education.
@huddy. @Dark Stranger
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:03 a.m.
Looking for world class legal representation?
acerxtroThe Court will not hold Mr. DarkStranger_000 in contempt, mostly due to his status as a law student and his willingness to continue learning the law. I am in no hurry to discourage...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 05:03 a.m.
Thankyou Your Honor, and I truly apologies for my misinterpretation of your statement.
huddy.Looking for world class legal representation?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 05:04 a.m.
And here he continues personal attacks
huddy.Looking for world class legal representation?
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:04 a.m.
Don't make my clerks find your first cases
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:05 a.m.
Lmfao true true true
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:05 a.m.
At least I didn’t go around preaching myself and lying to the public though
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:05 a.m.
let the record show that your honor IJBOL at that statement though
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:05 a.m.@Dark Stranger Expect a lawsuit shortly.
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:05 a.m.
Anyway so what happens now
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:05 a.m.
Mr. Billy is questioned regarding what exactly?
huddy.acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:06 a.m.
can we stop puffing manes
Dark StrangerAnd here he continues personal attacks
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:06 a.m.
I know right how DARE I copy and paste your legal advert
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:06 a.m.
Contain yourself
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:06 a.m.
?order
Dyno Bot2025-03-31 05:06 a.m.
Order!
“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1,Kingley Napley v. Adolobee , No. CV-0068-24, (Mayfl. Dist. Ct. Feb. 19 2025) (citing Zrihem, et al. v. TDark99 , 1 Mayfl. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op., at 11) (Cabot, J., dissenting)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1,
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:06 a.m.
Anyways that was the last one I promise
huddy.True that. I shall stop talking, but we move for Darkstranger_000 to be held in contempt and his actions made aware to the Defendant so that he may be removed as counsel and quit j...
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:09 a.m.
A defendant should be fully aware of their lawyer’s capabilities and competency, as they entrust them with their entire representations, as outlined in their Notice of Appearance
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:16 a.m.
Let the record show that, for whatever reason, the universe hates the defendant and has rate limited them on Discord
@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:16 a.m.
thank you clerk @Evexom
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:16 a.m.
Do not say these words
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 05:18 a.m.
that is like 9 months old message or something
very fast action by discord mods
very fast action by discord mods
huddy. 2025-03-31 05:22 a.m.
Interesting
billy (disabled account) 2025-04-01 02:19 a.m.
okay im out of the timeout corner
billy (disabled account) 2025-04-01 02:19 a.m.@acerxtro YOUR HONOR, ID LIKE TO FIRE MY LAWYER this guy FUCKING SUCKS 
billy (disabled account) 2025-04-01 02:23 a.m.
(DarkStranger_000)
billy (disabled account)acerxtro 2025-04-01 02:58 a.m.
Ok your new lawyers are here
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-01 02:58 a.m. @acerxtro has added @Evexom to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-01 02:58 a.m. @acerxtro has added @Toby Ellis, Esq. to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-01 02:59 a.m. @acerxtro has removed @Dark Stranger from the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-04-01 02:59 a.m.@Evexom @Toby Ellis, Esq. Hello welcome
acerxtro 2025-04-01 02:59 a.m.@Dark Stranger
acerxtro 2025-04-01 02:59 a.m.
When can I get a compliant civil response
Evexom 2025-04-01 02:59 a.m.
acerxtroWhen can I get a compliant civil response
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-01 02:59 a.m.
I'll work on it when I'm home
Fliply27Evexom 2025-04-01 02:59 a.m.
Cc @Dark Stranger
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-01 03:00 a.m.@Dark Stranger Sir, you have been FIRED.
Evexom 2025-04-01 03:00 a.m.
Okay I’m going back to siege. Response tomorrow
acerxtro 2025-04-01 07:57 p.m.@Toby Ellis, Esq.
acerxtroEvexom 2025-04-01 08:04 p.m.
response soon !
Evexom 2025-04-01 08:04 p.m.
(I already have it written just gotta put it on a doc)
Evexom 2025-04-02 02:04 p.m.
(i got busy grading bar exams, sorry)
Evexom 2025-04-02 02:12 p.m.@acerxtro Response soon, just getting clarification from my client
Fliply27acerxtro 2025-04-02 02:13 p.m.
24h
Evexom 2025-04-02 02:13 p.m.
Evexom 2025-04-02 02:20 p.m.@acerxtro @huddy.
huddy. 2025-04-02 02:21 p.m.
Interesting
huddy.Interesting
acerxtro 2025-04-02 06:24 p.m.
Any objection
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:17 a.m. 
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:17 a.m.
Lander Bridge is a public zone but ok
acerxtro 2025-04-04 08:41 a.m.
Ok cool
acerxtro 2025-04-04 08:42 a.m.
Any pretrial motions before discovery @huddy. @Evexom
huddy. 2025-04-04 09:09 a.m.
Not from our end
acerxtro used /discovery
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-09 03:19 a.m. Discovery has been opened for 24 hours .
During discovery, both parties can admit evidence & witnesses, titling them alphabetically (separate from the other party's exhibits.
Discovery will end 6 months ago . Alternatively, if both parties agree to end discovery early, discovery may end early.
Discovery Opened
During discovery, both parties can admit evidence & witnesses, titling them alphabetically (separate from the other party's exhibits.
acerxtro 2025-04-09 03:19 a.m.@huddy. @Evexom
acerxtro 2025-04-11 01:21 a.m.@huddy. @Evexom Any other pretrial motions before scheduling?(edited)
acerxtrohuddy. 2025-04-11 04:36 a.m.
Not from our end
huddy. 2025-04-11 04:36 a.m.
Hollon are you joking
huddy. 2025-04-11 04:36 a.m.
I submitted Discovery yesterday and sent a courtesy here
huddy. 2025-04-11 04:36 a.m.
And it's not
huddy. 2025-04-11 04:36 a.m.
I think it never sent with the API shit yesterday
huddy.I think it never sent with the API shit yesterday
acerxtro 2025-04-11 08:39 a.m.
acerxtrohuddy. 2025-04-11 08:41 a.m.
Would I be able to resubmit?
huddy.Would I be able to resubmit?
acerxtro 2025-04-11 08:43 a.m.
Yeah go ahead
huddy. 2025-04-11 08:46 a.m.
acerxtro 2025-04-11 08:50 a.m.
Any pretrial motions before scheduling @Evexom @huddy.
huddy. 2025-04-11 08:52 a.m.
Nope
huddy. 2025-04-16 06:48 a.m.@acerxtro Would we be able to move to trial now?
acerxtro 2025-04-16 06:49 a.m.@Evexom
acerxtroEvexom 2025-04-16 02:42 p.m.
If we can start a trial over discord I think that'll work best
Evexom 2025-04-16 02:42 p.m.
Im ready whenever though
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-16 04:46 p.m.
As am I
huddy. 2025-04-17 02:56 a.m.
Same
acerxtro 2025-04-17 03:00 a.m.
Ok
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-30 11:38 a.m. @acerxtro has added @bommes to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-04-30 11:38 a.m.@bommes
bommes 2025-04-30 11:58 a.m.@acerxtro so this is just setting up a trial date and time I take it?
huddy. 2025-04-30 01:25 p.m.@bommes We are doing a continuous discord trial
huddy. 2025-04-30 01:25 p.m.
Can we get something sorted asap please?
bommes 2025-04-30 04:18 p.m.
Naturally
bommes 2025-04-30 04:19 p.m.@Evexom @huddy. can you do in-game and if so when
bommes 2025-04-30 04:19 p.m.
toss me some times
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:22 p.m.
Nope
huddy.Nope
bommes 2025-04-30 04:23 p.m.
you mean to tell me you have not one single time slot available this entire week?
bommes 2025-04-30 04:23 p.m.
wait
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:23 p.m.
Jah
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:23 p.m.
Not on PC
bommes 2025-04-30 04:24 p.m.
what am I thinking, a discord trial was already suggested
bommes 2025-04-30 04:24 p.m.
let’s not overcomplicate this
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:24 p.m.
Yeah
bommes 2025-04-30 04:25 p.m.@huddy. @Evexom okay same idea but throw me times for a discord trial to be set up
Evexom 2025-04-30 11:40 p.m.
We ask for an in-game trial to speed up the process. @bommes
Fliply27We ask for an in-game trial to speed up the process. @bommes
bommes 2025-05-01 04:48 a.m.
You were the one that suggested a discord trial to begin with. What changed?
bommesYou were the one that suggested a discord trial to begin with. What changed?
Evexom 2025-05-01 04:51 a.m.
The fact its been two weeks since I said that and nothing has been done
Fliply27The fact its been two weeks since I said that and nothing has been done
bommes 2025-05-01 04:53 a.m.
Well I’m here now so if you work with me we can get something set up, discord or otherwise.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:52 p.m.@bommes Can we move on with this with a continuous discord trial please
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:52 p.m.
we are wasting enough time#
bommes 2025-05-05 03:53 p.m.
Due to a lack of reply from defense counsel, I am authorising a discord trial for the sake of getting this moving along. It's been over a month at this point.
Any objections to this can be filed in writing.
cc:@Evexom @huddy.
Any objections to this can be filed in writing.
cc:
bommes 2025-05-05 03:54 p.m.Generate and copy various Discord timestamp codes—long date, short date, relative time & more. Perfect for scheduling and event announcements.
Now, I will repeat my question: trial when? Date and times that work preferred. You can use this so that you don't have to hear my gears grind trying to convert it to my timezone: https://discordtimestamp.com/
huddy. 2025-05-06 12:59 p.m.Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 12:59 p.m.
huddy. 2025-05-06 12:59 p.m.@bommes
bommes 2025-05-06 01:10 p.m.
I see what you did there
bommes 2025-05-06 01:11 p.m.
I'm going to proceed, it's gone on long enough as is.
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:12 p.m.
Wonderful
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:12 p.m.
I have no clue what you're talking about
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:12 p.m.
but can we begin?
huddy.I have no clue what you're talking about
bommes 2025-05-06 01:13 p.m.
literally what I said, we're getting this underway
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:13 p.m.
wunderbar
bommes 2025-05-06 01:13 p.m.@huddy. call your first witness
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:16 p.m.
Plaintiff calls Plaintiff @NEW4RK to the stand.
bommes 2025-05-06 01:16 p.m.
This ought to be interesting
bommes used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 01:17 p.m. @bommes has added @NEW4RK to the case channel.
Case Modified
bommes used /administeroath
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 01:17 p.m.@NEW4RK Which type of oath would you like to swear to?
Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.
Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury. Religious Oath Non-Religious Oath
Oath Selection
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:18 p.m.
No opening statements? @bommes
bommes 2025-05-06 02:23 p.m.
didn't we already do those
bommes 2025-05-06 02:24 p.m.
I suppose not..
bommes 2025-05-06 02:24 p.m.
Yes you're right
bommes 2025-05-06 02:24 p.m.@huddy. belay that order, I skipped over something kind of important: openings
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:24 p.m.
This is why ingame trials are superior
huddy. 2025-05-06 02:40 p.m.
Your Honor, this trial will expose the tragic and unnecessary death of Plaintiff which directly stemmed out of Defendant's completely wrongful act of murder. This is not a case about a tragic accident. This is a case about deliberate misconduct, gross negligence, and the complete failure of the Defendant to act with any care or duty.
Defendant abused his abilities to handcuff and restrict the movement of Plaintiff in order to throw him mercilessly off a bridge into the water to drown, unable to defend himself.
The evidence will be clear. The facts are not in dispute. The law is on the Plaintiff’s side.
@bommes
Defendant abused his abilities to handcuff and restrict the movement of Plaintiff in order to throw him mercilessly off a bridge into the water to drown, unable to defend himself.
The evidence will be clear. The facts are not in dispute. The law is on the Plaintiff’s side.
bommes 2025-05-06 02:43 p.m.@huddy. thank you
bommes 2025-05-06 02:44 p.m.@Evexom do you wish to give your statement now or reserve it?
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:44 p.m.
We’ll reserve it
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:45 p.m.
I do have a comment though.
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:45 p.m.
If facts are not in dispute, why are we at trial
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:45 p.m.
Lmao
huddy. 2025-05-06 02:46 p.m.
Because we are simply dying to hear your defense!!
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:47 p.m.
Do you know the purpose of trial?
huddy. 2025-05-06 02:57 p.m.@bommes May I call my first witness?
bommes 2025-05-06 03:02 p.m.
wait, he does have a point
bommes 2025-05-06 03:02 p.m.@huddy. in all seriousness why are we at trial if facts arent disputed
bommeshuddy. 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
It's a way of saying that by the end of the trial, once you've reviewed the evidence and arguments, it will be impossible to understand any dispute of facts
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
Thought it was poetic idk
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
"are not" is present tense
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
"will not be" is future
bommes 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.
okay so poorly worded closing sentence aside, we will continue
bommes 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.@huddy. your witness was called but he was yet to take the oath
bommes 2025-05-06 03:05 p.m.
seemingly he still is
BotclerkFlowbommes 2025-05-06 03:05 p.m.
.
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:05 p.m.@NEW4RK
bommes 2025-05-06 03:08 p.m.@huddy. since I doubt he will be here in the next 5 minutes, do you have any other witnesses you'd like to call in the meantime who are ready to be questioned
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:08 p.m.@billy (disabled account)
bommes 2025-05-06 03:08 p.m.
alright then
bommes used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 03:08 p.m. @bommes has added @billy (disabled account) to the case channel.
Case Modified
bommes used /administeroath
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 03:09 p.m.@billy (disabled account) Which type of oath would you like to swear to?
Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.
Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury. Religious Oath Non-Religious Oath
Oath Selection
NEW4RK 2025-05-06 06:22 p.m.
I was asleep what have I got to do
NEW4RKI was asleep what have I got to do
bommes 2025-05-06 06:41 p.m.
You’re called upon to testify. You will see a dialog with 2 buttons. Pick an oath to swear to and answer with I do when the bot asks the appropriate question.
bommes used /administeroath
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 06:41 p.m.@NEW4RK (edited)Which type of oath would you like to swear to?
Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.
Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury. Religious Oath Non-Religious Oath
Oath Selection
BotclerkFlowclerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 06:41 p.m.@NEW4RK Do you solemnly affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, under the pains and penalties of perjury?
Non-Religious Oath
bommes 2025-05-06 06:42 p.m.
Do you?
NEW4RK 2025-05-06 06:42 p.m.
I do
bommes 2025-05-06 06:42 p.m.
Perfect
bommes 2025-05-06 06:42 p.m.@huddy. Your witness. Sorry for the back and forth. He popped up before billy did
huddy. 2025-05-07 02:34 a.m.@NEW4RK Please state your name for the record
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 02:34 a.m.
NateStratt
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:33 a.m.@NEW4RK What is your relation to this case?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:34 a.m.
I am the Plaintiff initiating this suit.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:36 a.m.@NEW4RK Where were you on the 11th of March, at approxomately 14:42pm EST?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:36 a.m.
Lander Bridge.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:36 a.m.@NEW4RK What were you doing on Lander Bridge?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:37 a.m.
I was sitting in the back of the Defendant's vehicle.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:37 a.m.@NEW4RK Are you referring to Defendant’s official, department-issued patrol vehicle?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:39 a.m.
Yes.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:40 a.m.@NEW4RK Why were you in his vehicle?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:45 a.m.
He had offered me a ride to the car dealership in Lander City.
huddy. 2025-05-07 11:48 a.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-05-07 11:48 a.m.
I just realised we never had discovery
huddy.Click to see attachment.
Evexom 2025-05-07 12:44 p.m.
Yes we have @huddy.
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-07 12:47 p.m.
Objection, leading. @bommes
Fliply27Yes we have @huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:00 p.m.
Oh, I couldn't find it on the courts site, must be an issue with filing
huddy.Oh, I couldn't find it on the courts site, must be an issue with filing
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:01 p.m.
Probably because you never filed it
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:01 p.m.
That's not probable at all. Thanks for the input.
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:01 p.m.
Has happened before, so it is pretty probable
Fliply27Objection, leading. @bommes
bommes 2025-05-07 01:11 p.m.
Sustained
bommes 2025-05-07 01:12 p.m.
cc: @huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:12 p.m.@NEW4RK When you refer to Defendant's vehicle, what vehicle was that?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 01:13 p.m.
Defendant's department-issued vehicle.
NEW4RKI was sitting in the back of the Defendant's vehicle.
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:17 p.m.
Objection, lack of foundation & assumes facts not in evidence. The identity of the Defendant hasn't been established on the record and this court has no basis as to know who "Defendant" is or even if they had a vehicle. Let alone that the witness was in it.
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:17 p.m.
cc @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:19 p.m.
Your Honor you cannot expect us to use this witness to establish the identity of the Defendant on the record when we have just started questioning
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:19 p.m.
I haven't even got to presenting evidence
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:22 p.m.
And you cannot expect the Court to constantly bend over backwards for you since you don't know how to do direct examination
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:24 p.m.
Excuse me? This is your first objection to a lack of foundation?
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:24 p.m.
You've done the same thing in other cases
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:24 p.m.
Calm down evexom
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:24 p.m.
No need to get worked up
bommes 2025-05-07 01:51 p.m.
Alright you two, that’s quite enough. I must agree with defendant’s counsel in this regard. You can’t start naming people without establishing who they are or what bearing they have on the case. Same way you can’t talk about evidence without introducing it.
So I’ll sustain the objection.
cc:@Evexom @huddy.
So I’ll sustain the objection.
cc:
NEW4RKDefendant's department-issued vehicle.
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:53 p.m.
Objection, lack of foundation & speculation. The witness is assuming the Defendant (who hasn't been identified) has a vehicle and that the witness is qualified to identify it as the "Defendants"
@bommes
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:53 p.m.
Objecting to both the answer and the question ^
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:54 p.m.
Your Honor
bommes 2025-05-07 01:54 p.m.
Yes?
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:54 p.m.
How am I supposed to identify Defendant without questioning Defendant or even being able to present any evidence
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:54 p.m.
You want me to ask Plaintiff who Defendant is?
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:54 p.m.
Since we are unable to figure that out?
bommes 2025-05-07 01:55 p.m.
You are very much able to figure it out. I am simply sustaining an objection pertaining to assumptions made.
Fliply27Objection, lack of foundation & speculation. The witness is assuming the Defendant (who hasn't been identified) has a vehicle and that the witness is qualified to identify it as th...
Evexom 2025-05-07 01:56 p.m.@bommes May we get a ruling so we can proceed?
bommes 2025-05-07 01:57 p.m.
Let me double check something before I do.
Fliply27Objection, lack of foundation & speculation. The witness is assuming the Defendant (who hasn't been identified) has a vehicle and that the witness is qualified to identify it as th...
bommes 2025-05-07 02:02 p.m.
Sustained. While it is plausible even for a lay witness to determine whether or not a vehicle is department issued, it’s not possible to know at this time that it belongs to the defendant
bommes 2025-05-07 02:03 p.m.@huddy. You may rephrase your questioning if you wish
Evexom 2025-05-07 03:02 p.m.@huddy. Gonna finish up?
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:05 p.m.
No, I'm good thank you.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:06 p.m.@NEW4RK I'd like to present to you a video marked as Exhibit A submitted in the discovery.
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jRthEQyAfyD0bpaGr?invite=cr-MSxxbFIsMTM4NDg5MTgz26 Views. Watch Roblox Trimmed Clip 1 and millions of other Roblox videos captured using Medal. 
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jRthEQyAfyD0bpaGr?invite=cr-MSxxbFIsMTM4NDg5MTgz
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:06 p.m.
Do you recognise the contents of this video?
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-07 03:13 p.m.@bommes Seeing as everything else relating to the vehicle was struck, we move to strike this and the answer for lack of foundation
cc@huddy.
cc
Evexom 2025-05-07 03:13 p.m.
Sorry for the delay on that
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:15 p.m.
We gathered that, hence why I'm regoing at the followings
Evexom 2025-05-07 03:15 p.m.
Still needs to be on the record that it's struck
bommes 2025-05-07 03:19 p.m.
So struck, carry on
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:20 p.m.@NEW4RK
huddy.Do you recognise the contents of this video?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:37 p.m.
I do.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:38 p.m.@NEW4RK Are you the recorder of this video?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:38 p.m.
I am.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:39 p.m.@NEW4RK Are you the owner of this video?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:41 p.m.
I am.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:56 p.m.@NEW4RK Do the contents of the video accurately depict the incident that took place on Lander Bridge on the 11th of March?
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 03:57 p.m.
They do.
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-07 04:03 p.m.
Objection, lack of foundation & vague. It hasn't been established, (a) what the video shows and (b) That the video was taken at the time and place. Furthermore, what "incident".
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:03 p.m.
Withdrawn, I meant to add 'if any'
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:03 p.m.
beat me to it
Fliply27Objection, lack of foundation & vague. It hasn't been established, (a) what the video shows and (b) That the video was taken at the time and place. Furthermore, what "incident".
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:04 p.m.
cc @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:07 p.m.@NEW4RK Is this video a video of an interaction between you and Defendant ParkRangerBilly on Lander Bridge on the 11th of March at 14:42 EST?
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:07 p.m.
Objection
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:08 p.m.
Assumes facts not in evidence
Fliply27Objection, lack of foundation & vague. It hasn't been established, (a) what the video shows and (b) That the video was taken at the time and place. Furthermore, what "incident".
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:08 p.m.@bommes May we get a ruling?
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:08 p.m.
Your Honor I already withdrew that
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:08 p.m.
Womp womp
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:08 p.m.
I want my ruling
huddy.NEW4RK 2025-05-07 04:08 p.m.
It is.
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:08 p.m.
Yurr don't respond when miss angry objects
NEW4RK 2025-05-07 04:09 p.m.
oh my bad
Fliply27Objection, lack of foundation & vague. It hasn't been established, (a) what the video shows and (b) That the video was taken at the time and place. Furthermore, what "incident".
bommes 2025-05-07 04:12 p.m.
sustained
Fliply27Assumes facts not in evidence
bommes 2025-05-07 04:14 p.m.
sustained
bommes 2025-05-07 04:14 p.m.
I advise you to rethink your strategy here counsel
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:15 p.m.@NEW4RK Has this video been altered or edited in any way?
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:16 p.m.
Objection
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:16 p.m.
Lack of foundation. The witness hasn't testified to their familitary with the video
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:16 p.m.
Yes they have?
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:16 p.m.
Have they reviewed it at all to actually verify it?
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:17 p.m.
He has testified that he recognises the contents and is the recorder and owner of this video
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:17 p.m.
Yes, obviously he has reviewed the contents in order to say that he recognises it
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:17 p.m.
I don't see it on the record
Fliply27Lack of foundation. The witness hasn't testified to their familitary with the video
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:17 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:18 p.m.
Your Honor it is absurd to think that my client is so stupid that he has not reviewed the contents of a video before telling us that it is recognised and confirming his ownership and recording of it - this is wasting the court's time
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:18 p.m.
The only person here insinuating that the witness is stupid is yourself
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:19 p.m.
Yehaw love a random and baseless Fliply classic
Fliply27Lack of foundation. The witness hasn't testified to their familitary with the video
Evexom 2025-05-07 04:58 p.m.@bommes hey
bommes 2025-05-07 05:01 p.m.
No objection was raised to the witness testifying that they recorded the video and that they own the footage
It appears pointless to ascertain that someone who produced the video is not familiar with the video in question
tl;dr: overruled.
cc:@Evexom @huddy.
It appears pointless to ascertain that someone who produced the video is not familiar with the video in question
tl;dr: overruled.
cc:
Evexom 2025-05-07 05:01 p.m.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:25 a.m.@NEW4RK Has this video been altered or edited in any way?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:26 a.m.
No it hasn’t.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:31 a.m.@NEW4RK When was the video taken?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:32 a.m.
11th of March.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:33 a.m.@NEW4RK Are the events in this video exactly as you remember them happening on the 11th of March?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:33 a.m.
They are.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:34 a.m.@bommes We move for Exhibit A to be entered into evidence.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:49 a.m.
No objection
bommes 2025-05-08 07:38 a.m.
So admitted.
cc:@Evexom @huddy.
cc:
huddy. 2025-05-08 07:41 a.m.@NEW4RK I’d like you to watch the video in its entirety again and let me know once you have done so.
huddy.NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:45 a.m.
Done.
huddy. 2025-05-08 07:47 a.m.@NEW4RK What are you doing at the beginning of Exhibit A?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:48 a.m.
I am sitting in the back of a law enforcement patrol car.
NEW4RKI am sitting in the back of a law enforcement patrol car.
huddy. 2025-05-08 07:49 a.m.
Who was driving the law enforcement patrol vehicle?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:49 a.m.
Defendant ParkRangerBilly.
NEW4RKDefendant ParkRangerBilly.
huddy. 2025-05-08 07:50 a.m.
Why were you in the vehicle?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:50 a.m.
I had been offered a ride by the Defendant, so he was taking me to the Lander Car Dealer to spawn my car.
NEW4RKI had been offered a ride by the Defendant, so he was taking me to the Lander Car Dealer to spawn my car.
huddy. 2025-05-08 07:52 a.m.
Why did the vehicle pull over to the side of Lander Bridge?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:53 a.m.
I asked the Defendant to pull over, so that I could walk the rest of the journey.
NEW4RKI asked the Defendant to pull over, so that I could walk the rest of the journey.
huddy. 2025-05-08 07:53 a.m.
Why didn't you get out of the vehicle immediately once Defendant had pulled to a stop?
huddy. 2025-05-08 11:55 a.m.@NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 11:56 a.m.
I was scared to exit the vehicle at the time as I was extremely close to the barrier, If I had of stepped out, I risked being flung due to the buggy physics of the game.
NEW4RKI was scared to exit the vehicle at the time as I was extremely close to the barrier, If I had of stepped out, I risked being flung due to the buggy physics of the game.
huddy. 2025-05-08 11:57 a.m.
And what happened next?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 11:57 a.m.
I was unexpectedly handcuffed by the Defendant.
NEW4RKI was unexpectedly handcuffed by the Defendant.
huddy. 2025-05-08 11:57 a.m.
And after that?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 11:58 a.m.
Defendant grabbed me so that I was unable to move, restricting me even further.
NEW4RKDefendant grabbed me so that I was unable to move, restricting me even further.
huddy. 2025-05-08 11:58 a.m.
And what events, if any, occurred after that?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 11:58 a.m.
Defendant walked over to the side of the bridge and let me go, so I fell into the water and drowned.
NEW4RKDefendant walked over to the side of the bridge and let me go, so I fell into the water and drowned.
huddy. 2025-05-08 11:59 a.m.
How did you feel when you were dropped into the water?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 11:59 a.m.
I felt confused as to why he would do this to me, I was shocked as somebody with law enforcement powers should be held to a higher standard, and I felt scared for my life as I plunged to my death.
huddy. 2025-05-08 12:00 p.m.@bommes No further questions.
huddy.bommes 2025-05-08 12:00 p.m.
great, thank you
bommes 2025-05-08 12:01 p.m.@Evexom you may object and/or cross examine the witness
NEW4RKI had been offered a ride by the Defendant, so he was taking me to the Lander Car Dealer to spawn my car.
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:29 p.m.
Objection, Hearsay
@bommes
NEW4RKI was scared to exit the vehicle at the time as I was extremely close to the barrier, If I had of stepped out, I risked being flung due to the buggy physics of the game.
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:29 p.m.
Objection, Speculation & Narrative
NEW4RKI felt confused as to why he would do this to me, I was shocked as somebody with law enforcement powers should be held to a higher standard, and I felt scared for my life as I plun...
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:35 p.m.
Objection, Relevance, Misleading, Argumentative, & Prejudicial
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:35 p.m.
(to the question & answer)
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:36 p.m.
We have party-opponent admmissions exempted under MRoP don't we??
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:36 p.m.
1 sec
Fliply27Objection, Speculation & Narrative
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:36 p.m.
It's not speculation, it's a game fact - if you step out of a vehicle by a wall, you are flung by game physics 100% of the time
Fliply27Objection, Relevance, Misleading, Argumentative, & Prejudicial
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:38 p.m.
Your Honor we beg you to instruct opposing counsel to expand upon this
huddy.It's not speculation, it's a game fact - if you step out of a vehicle by a wall, you are flung by game physics 100% of the time
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:38 p.m.
You sure?
huddy.It's not speculation, it's a game fact - if you step out of a vehicle by a wall, you are flung by game physics 100% of the time
bommes 2025-05-08 01:39 p.m.
Before I instruct him, I’d like to instruct you to expand on how you know this to be a fact 100% of the time.
For if it is as you say, it could be taken under judicial notice, however I am far from inclined to do so currently
For if it is as you say, it could be taken under judicial notice, however I am far from inclined to do so currently
Fliply27You sure?
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:43 p.m.
Your Honor, this is a joke
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:44 p.m.
1. The vehicle is not parked up close to the wall at all...
2. His model of vehicle has a protruding base body which means that there is space to stand so the game allows an exemption...
3. The vehicle is parked next to a thin wall with a room inside, and not a thick and non-hollow wall with nothing on the other side.
1. Vehicle driven by Defendant was right up to the wall.
2. The model of Defendant's vehicle has a flat side, meaning that he could completely touch it with no air gap to the side of the wall.
3. The wall was a thick barrier with nothing on the other side.
2. His model of vehicle has a protruding base body which means that there is space to stand so the game allows an exemption...
3. The vehicle is parked next to a thin wall with a room inside, and not a thick and non-hollow wall with nothing on the other side.
1. Vehicle driven by Defendant was right up to the wall.
2. The model of Defendant's vehicle has a flat side, meaning that he could completely touch it with no air gap to the side of the wall.
3. The wall was a thick barrier with nothing on the other side.
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:45 p.m.
I will go and demonstrate.
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:45 p.m.
"if you step out of a vehicle by a wall, you are flung by game physics 100% of the time" I have just disproven that.
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:45 p.m.
You haven't disproven that
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:46 p.m.
You proved that if you park a vehicle a stud away from a hollow wall with a room on the other side with a protruding body, you are not flung out.
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:46 p.m.
Well done!
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:46 p.m.
Clark county wouldn't be clark county if that were not true
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:46 p.m.
Your Honor, allow me a minute to demonstrate
bommes 2025-05-08 01:46 p.m.
I’m going to allow James to conduct his test. Seems only fair in this instance
bommes 2025-05-08 01:47 p.m.
While you do that, I’m going to look at the raised objections
Fliply27Objection, Hearsay @bommes
bommes 2025-05-08 01:47 p.m.
sustained
Fliply27Objection, Speculation & Narrative
bommes 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
this one is put on hold for a moment
Fliply27Objection, Relevance, Misleading, Argumentative, & Prejudicial
bommes 2025-05-08 01:50 p.m.
per opposing counsel’s request, I’d like you to elaborate on this. specifically how it is prejudicial(edited)
bommes 2025-05-08 01:52 p.m.@huddy. Let me know when your test has concluded
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:58 p.m.
"somebody with law enforcement powers should be held to a higher standard" is argumentative and irrelevant. Its an opinion and not a fact.
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:59 p.m.@bommes Unfortunately, I cannot recreate the glitch due to it having been patched twice since the time that the footage took place 
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:00 p.m.
First picture is irrelevant, thats relating to entering the vehicle
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:01 p.m.
And it just states "errors" it doesn't specify this specific error you claim exists (or existed)
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:01 p.m.
As such neither of those should hold any weight.
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:03 p.m.
Are you a scripter?
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:03 p.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:03 p.m.
Then why did you just make the most ignorant statement ever
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:03 p.m.
Do you understand the controllers and scripts involved in a script allowing an individual to leave the passenger seat of a vehicle?
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:04 p.m.
Do you understand the possible errors that could occur?
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:04 p.m.
There are absolutely none, apart from staying in sitting animation, or being ragdolled. Absolutely no record in the history of Mayflower has depicted an individual leaving a vehicle and being stuck in a sitting animation - errors clearly refers to being ragdolled. Anybody with common sense who has played Clark County before has witnessed this.
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
What are you even yapping about
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
Ah yes
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
another classic
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.@bommes When can we expect a ruling?
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
man makes ignorant statement, ignores response and refers to it as 'yap'
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
bommes 2025-05-08 02:11 p.m.
okay tone it down, I think I can safely say here that none of us worked on development for Clark so we all lack the expertise to say for sure whether this has or has not occurred
However I agree that the first picture doesn’t show much as this is pertaining to exiting a vehicle, not entering it
However I agree that the first picture doesn’t show much as this is pertaining to exiting a vehicle, not entering it
Fliply27"somebody with law enforcement powers should be held to a higher standard" is argumentative and irrelevant. Its an opinion and not a fact.
bommes 2025-05-08 02:14 p.m.
I’m going to sustain this
bommes 2025-05-08 02:14 p.m.
I am unsure if this is outside my authority but one way to be sure about this supposed vehicle malfunction is to summon the vehicle scripter to the stand to put this issue to rest once and for all(edited)
bommes 2025-05-08 02:17 p.m.
However since I don’t want to let parties wait around for this to be arranged, I am currently sustaining the objection insofar as that it is not able to be proven that the suggested malfunction occurs “100% of the time”
bommes 2025-05-08 02:18 p.m.
I am aware this can be a possible avenue of appeal, which is why I’m extensively documenting it
bommes 2025-05-08 02:18 p.m.@Evexom you may cross examine if you wish
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:19 p.m.
Alright give me a minute to have lunch and I'll begin
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:02 p.m.
Your Honor, it did occur 100% percent of the time, that's how the script was written, so that it would do that @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:02 p.m.
Hence why the patch rewrote the script
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:02 p.m.
You have just ruled on this objection but we urge you to summon the script writer to confirm this
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:02 p.m.
as this is an essential part of the case
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:02 p.m.
Actually ignore that, it means absolutely nothing, I forgot
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:02 p.m.
Withdrawn.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:03 p.m.
You testified you were in the back of a law enforcement patrol vehicle, correct?
@NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:06 p.m.
Correct.
NEW4RKCorrect.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:06 p.m.
You are not a law enforcement officer, are you?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:07 p.m.
I don't believe so, no.
NEW4RKI don't believe so, no.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:09 p.m.
Just to be clear, are you, or are you not, a law enforcement officer?
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:09 p.m.
Objection, asked and answered @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:09 p.m.
Clearly reads 'no'
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:09 p.m.
He didn't answer, he evaded the question
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:09 p.m.
"I don't believe so" is speculation and not an answer to my question.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:10 p.m.
'No' is not speculation, and is an answer to your question
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:10 p.m.
He isn't evading anything
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:11 p.m.
Its a binary question and "I don't believe so" is not a definitive statement. Its a hedge response.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:12 p.m.
What does it read after that?
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:12 p.m.
He needs to provide a clear and unambiguous answer
Fliply27Its a binary question and "I don't believe so" is not a definitive statement. Its a hedge response.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:16 p.m.
hedged response *
huddy.Objection, asked and answered @bommes
bommes 2025-05-08 03:24 p.m.
Overruled. Answers should be unambiguous preferably so asking for a clear answer is not an asked and answered instance in this case(edited)
Fliply27Just to be clear, are you, or are you not, a law enforcement officer?
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:24 p.m.@NEW4RK
Fliply27Just to be clear, are you, or are you not, a law enforcement officer?
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:28 p.m.
Second Objection; Relevance @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:28 p.m.
What relation could this possibly have to the case at hand
bommes 2025-05-08 03:28 p.m.@Evexom Where are you going with this?
bommesEvexom 2025-05-08 03:29 p.m.
I'm getting there
Fliply27Just to be clear, are you, or are you not, a law enforcement officer?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:29 p.m.
No.
bommes 2025-05-08 03:29 p.m.
question and answer are struck for the moment
Fliply27I'm getting there
bommes 2025-05-08 03:30 p.m.
I fail to see how this has any bearing on the matter at hand
bommesI fail to see how this has any bearing on the matter at hand
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:32 p.m.
The witness has testified that he was in the back of a law enforcement vehicle. He is not under arrest, he is not a law enforcement officer. Whether or not he had any lawful or official reason to be in said vehicle is directly relevant in evaluation the credibility of his testimony, the nature of this encounter, and whether or not his presence in that vehicle was authorized or improper.
The Plaintiff is presenting himself as a passenger in a law enforcement context, whether or not he has the authority or status to be there affects the weight of every claim that follows.
The Plaintiff is presenting himself as a passenger in a law enforcement context, whether or not he has the authority or status to be there affects the weight of every claim that follows.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:34 p.m.
This has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not he is a law enforcement officer
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:35 p.m.
And that argument has absolutely nothing to do with this case - this is not a wrongful imprisonment/arrest case, this is a suit discussing the dropping of an individual off a bridge
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:35 p.m.
The issue is not about his job title, it's about whether the Plaintiff had any lawful reason to be in the patrol vehicle.
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:37 p.m.
1. That has nothing to do with whether or not he is a law enforcement officer.
2. What has Plaintiff having or not having a lawful reason to be in a patrol vehicle have anything to do with somebody dropping him off a bridge
2. What has Plaintiff having or not having a lawful reason to be in a patrol vehicle have anything to do with somebody dropping him off a bridge
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:37 p.m.
The two are not in any way linked
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:37 p.m.
and it is completely irrelevant and a fishing expedition to go on a questioning line to attempt to connect them Your Honor @bommes
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:40 p.m.
Your honor, this case concerns the entire encounter between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, not just the moment the Plaintiff was allegedly dropped from the bridge.
The Plaintiff's presence in a patrol vehicle, without any lawful authority or justification, is the starting point of that encounter. If the Plaintiff had no legal reason to be in that vehicle, the fact is driectly relevant to the credibility of his narrative.
The Plaintiff's presence in a patrol vehicle, without any lawful authority or justification, is the starting point of that encounter. If the Plaintiff had no legal reason to be in that vehicle, the fact is driectly relevant to the credibility of his narrative.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:40 p.m.
directly*
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:41 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:41 p.m.
Still has nothing to do with Plaintiff being or not being a LEO
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:42 p.m.
bommes 2025-05-08 03:42 p.m.
Here’s what I’m inclined to do
bommes 2025-05-08 03:43 p.m.
If there’s any question about whether or not the witness (well, plaintiff) had any business being in the police car, I deem it is a question best asked to the officer that was with him at the time
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:43 p.m.
The Witness was in the vehicle, he should know more than anyone.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:45 p.m.
I have 3-4 questions left in this line before I move on, if you allow me to finish.
bommes 2025-05-08 03:45 p.m.
Very well, but if it doesn’t bring anything credible forward I will strike everything from that question until the conclusion of that line
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:46 p.m.
Want me to reask the question since you struck it, or is my question and his answer back on the record?
bommes 2025-05-08 03:46 p.m.
You may re-ask. Easier for record keeping purposes
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:47 p.m.
Just to be clear, are you, or are you not, a law enforcement officer?
@NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:55 p.m.
No.
NEW4RKNo.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:56 p.m.
You weren't under arrest or in custody at the time of the incident, right?
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 03:58 p.m.
No.
NEW4RKNo.
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:58 p.m.
So you have no official reason to be in that vehicle, correct?
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:58 p.m.
had*
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 04:04 p.m.
Incorrect. Defendant allowed me to enter the vehicle in the back seat, so yes, he officially allowed me to be in that vehicle.
NEW4RKIncorrect. Defendant allowed me to enter the vehicle in the back seat, so yes, he officially allowed me to be in that vehicle.
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:08 p.m.@bommes Objection. hearsay. This is just another attempt to introduce the same out of court statement the court previously excluded. The Defednant is again testifying to what the Defendant allegedly said.
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:08 p.m.
Defendant*
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:08 p.m.
The Witness is again testifying to what the Defendant allegedly said. *
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:08 p.m.
Soryr
Fliply27bommes 2025-05-08 04:11 p.m.
Sustained, though I’ve never seen the attorney questioning someone raising an objection(edited)
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:11 p.m.
Wouldve been more proper to ask it to be struck,
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:11 p.m.
But oh well
bommes 2025-05-08 04:11 p.m.
shrug, it’s struck anyway, continue
bommesshrug, it’s struck anyway, continue
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:12 p.m.
Can you instruct the witness to not bring up statements that have been previously excluded by this court?
bommes 2025-05-08 04:13 p.m.@NEW4RK Please only testify regarding matters you personally know about, if you have to guess or rely on information from others (“he said that…”) then it is perfectly acceptable to say that you don’t have enough information to answer the question(edited)
Fliply27So you have no official reason to be in that vehicle, correct?
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:13 p.m.
Please re-answer @NEW4RK
huddy. 2025-05-08 04:27 p.m.@bommes Law enforcement vehicles are only entered into if the owner consents to it, as they have lock/remove perms
huddy. 2025-05-08 04:27 p.m.
Defendant told this court why he was in it
huddy. 2025-05-08 04:27 p.m.
What is he supposed to say if you’re striking it as hearsay even though he is judt testifying to a fact
huddy. 2025-05-08 04:28 p.m.
So it is now assumed that Plaintiff teleported into the vehicle?
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:28 p.m.
??
bommes 2025-05-08 04:28 p.m.
Not at all, but when he said the defendant allowed him into the vehicle, he is not here currently testifying to that is he?
bommes 2025-05-08 04:28 p.m.
What’s the definition of hearsay?
bommes 2025-05-08 04:28 p.m.
All together
bommes 2025-05-08 04:29 p.m.
An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted
bommes 2025-05-08 04:30 p.m.
…damn you all left me hanging, not cool….
Anyhow, you both passed the bar, I’m sure you both know how to get a fact asserted in a manner that’s not hearsay
Anyhow, you both passed the bar, I’m sure you both know how to get a fact asserted in a manner that’s not hearsay
bommes…damn you all left me hanging, not cool…. Anyhow, you both passed the bar, I’m sure you both know how to get a fact asserted in a manner that’s not hearsay
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:32 p.m.
Rip sorry, working on school while I wait for a response
Fliply27Rip sorry, working on school while I wait for a response
bommes 2025-05-08 04:33 p.m.
Fair, good luck in the meantime
Fliply27Please re-answer @NEW4RK
Evexom 2025-05-08 04:35 p.m.@NEW4RK
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:26 p.m.@NEW4RK
Evexom 2025-05-08 07:25 p.m.@bommes Can you instruct the Witness to answer the question? This is frankly ridiculous, they've been online the entire time
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:26 p.m.
It is half past midnight for me
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:26 p.m.
I am in bed
NEW4RK 2025-05-08 07:27 p.m.
I will reply later today
NEW4RKIt is half past midnight for me
Evexom 2025-05-08 07:27 p.m.
You've had three hours to answer the question, and you are typing now. Just answer it.
NEW4RK 2025-05-09 07:35 a.m.
I did have official reason to be in that vehicle. I previously asked Defendant for a ride to the Lander City Car Dealership, and he unlocked the doors for me.
Fliply27You've had three hours to answer the question, and you are typing now. Just answer it.
huddy. 2025-05-09 08:02 a.m.
Objection
huddy. 2025-05-09 08:02 a.m.
Argumentative
bommes 2025-05-09 08:07 a.m.
Sustained. This is a continuous discord trial and as such not everyone will be available immediately
bommes 2025-05-09 08:07 a.m.
If it gets out of hand however I’ll intervene
NEW4RKI did have official reason to be in that vehicle. I previously asked Defendant for a ride to the Lander City Car Dealership, and he unlocked the doors for me.
Evexom 2025-05-09 12:33 p.m.@bommes We move to strick, again. The witness is once again trying to bring in the out of court statement you previously excluded, just in slightly different wording.
Evexom 2025-05-09 12:34 p.m.
strike*
huddy. 2025-05-09 12:34 p.m.
Your Honor this is absurd
huddy. 2025-05-09 12:34 p.m.
There is no hearsay there
Fliply27huddy. 2025-05-09 12:34 p.m.
Tell us the grounds for the objection
huddy. 2025-05-09 12:34 p.m.
Defendant is telling the court what he personally said, and then what was factually carried out by the Defendant.
Evexom 2025-05-09 12:37 p.m.
Your Honor, you sustained my objection for this precise claim earlier in the trial. The witness is offering the same narrative, that the Defendant unlocked the door to allow the witness in in the vehicle, in order to justify his presence in the vehicle. This is testimonial use of an excluded statement.
bommes 2025-05-09 12:42 p.m.
Here's how I see the situation currently. The witness testifies that he asked the defendant for a ride (this would not be hearsay) and he also testifies that the defendant unlocked the door of his car for him. These facts can be verified and I do not believe that this is hearsay as he has not brought up a statement made by the defendant.
Thus I find that this statement differs from the earlier statement in a manner that he is strictly recounting his own experiences.
Thus I find that this statement differs from the earlier statement in a manner that he is strictly recounting his own experiences.
bommes 2025-05-09 12:43 p.m.
As such I am denying this (verbal) motion to strike, unless you wish to rephrase your quesstion
bommes 2025-05-09 12:43 p.m.
cc: @Evexom @huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-09 12:44 p.m.
thank you.
Evexom 2025-05-09 12:44 p.m.
So you just assumed that unlocking the door meant you could get in, right?
@NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-09 10:12 p.m.
Once I had approached Defendant's vehicle, which was locked, and asked him if I was able to get a ride, the vehicle was then unlocked. Nobody else was around who could have been mistaken for. Once I entered the vehicle, we began driving, and the doors were locked again.
Evexom 2025-05-09 10:42 p.m.@bommes We move to strike for nonresponsive. I asked the witness whether he assumed that the unlocked door meant he could enter. He did not answer the question and instead gave a narrative.
NEW4RKOnce I had approached Defendant's vehicle, which was locked, and asked him if I was able to get a ride, the vehicle was then unlocked. Nobody else was around who could have been mi...
bommes 2025-05-09 10:44 p.m.
Struck
NEW4RKOnce I had approached Defendant's vehicle, which was locked, and asked him if I was able to get a ride, the vehicle was then unlocked. Nobody else was around who could have been mi...
bommes 2025-05-09 10:45 p.m.
Please answer the question accurately while refraining from adding irrelevant information
bommes 2025-05-09 10:45 p.m.@Evexom Do you wish to repeat your question?
Evexom 2025-05-09 10:46 p.m.
I'll restate it so hopefully it's clearer for the witness: Did you assume that the unlocked door meant you could get into the vehicle?
@NEW4RK
Fliply27I'll restate it so hopefully it's clearer for the witness: Did you assume that the unlocked door meant you could get into the vehicle? @NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-10 04:52 a.m.
Based on the following facts,:
Once I had approached Defendant's vehicle, which was locked, and asked him if I was able to get a ride, the vehicle was then unlocked. Nobody else was around who could have been mistaken for. Once I entered the vehicle, we began driving, and the doors were locked again.
, I reasonably assumed that I was rightfully permitted to enter the vehicle.
Once I had approached Defendant's vehicle, which was locked, and asked him if I was able to get a ride, the vehicle was then unlocked. Nobody else was around who could have been mistaken for. Once I entered the vehicle, we began driving, and the doors were locked again.
, I reasonably assumed that I was rightfully permitted to enter the vehicle.
Evexom 2025-05-10 09:52 a.m.@bommes We move to strike again
Fliply27bommes 2025-05-10 09:53 a.m.
Again, struck.
NEW4RKBased on the following facts,: Once I had approached Defendant's vehicle, which was locked, and asked him if I was able to get a ride, the vehicle was then unlocked. Nobody else w...
bommes 2025-05-10 09:53 a.m.
Please try to keep your answer short and to the point. No need to write a paragraph here, witness
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:05 a.m.@bommes Your Honor
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:05 a.m.
Counsel asked 'Did you assume'
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:05 a.m.
Last line of Plaintiff's response, post his explanation of his decision, reads 'I reasonably assumed'
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:06 a.m.
Plaintiff isn't under any obligation to give one word answers, he can explain his decision
bommes 2025-05-10 10:06 a.m.
I don’t disagree, but why does he have to write an entire narrative around it in this instance, it’s not an “explain what happened” type of question
bommesI don’t disagree, but why does he have to write an entire narrative around it in this instance, it’s not an “explain what happened” type of question
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:08 a.m.
He's not typing an entire narrative, he's explaining the factual basis behind his decision which he is fully entitled to do
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:09 a.m.
He lists facts and then says 'based on that, I reasonably assumed...'
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:09 a.m.
Plaintiff is under no obligation to just right 'yes' as that would be pointless
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:09 a.m.
We move the court to unstrike the response
huddy.Plaintiff is under no obligation to just right 'yes' as that would be pointless
bommes 2025-05-10 10:16 a.m.
He is asking what is essentially a yes or no question, counsel. I don’t see how it is unreasonable to request the answer to be struck
Fliply27I'll restate it so hopefully it's clearer for the witness: Did you assume that the unlocked door meant you could get into the vehicle? @NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-10 10:21 a.m.Yes, based on several factors
Evexom 2025-05-10 09:44 p.m.
You testified that the video has not been edited or altered, correct?
@NEW4RK
billy (disabled account) 2025-05-11 12:11 a.m.
Wtf this court case is still going on
Fliply27You testified that the video has not been edited or altered, correct? @NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 04:01 a.m.
Correct.
NEW4RKCorrect.
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:12 p.m.
But you trimmed the video before submitting it, didn't you?
Fliply27But you trimmed the video before submitting it, didn't you?
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 01:17 p.m.
I had been recording with Medal for 2~ hours, so yes I did trim the clip to the incident in order to not waste the court's time.
NEW4RKI had been recording with Medal for 2~ hours, so yes I did trim the clip to the incident in order to not waste the court's time.
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:18 p.m.
So you removed part of the recording, that's editing, isn't it?
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 01:20 p.m.
I am not an expert nor have knowledge of the official definition of the word 'editing' or whether that includes trimming a 2 hour video, so I cannot reasonably answer that.
Fliply27So you removed part of the recording, that's editing, isn't it?
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:24 p.m.
Objection @bommes
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:24 p.m.
On what ground?
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:24 p.m.
Counsel is asking witness to testify a definition
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:24 p.m.
Which he cannot reasonably know as a lay witness
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:26 p.m.
Your honor, I'm not asking the witness to define the word "editing" in a technical sense, I'm asking whether he removed part of the video before submitting it. That's a factual question about what he did, not a request for expert opinion. His own prior testimony was that the video was "not edited or altered," and I'm entitled to explore the truthfulness of that claim.
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:26 p.m.
Excuse me?
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:26 p.m.
You are not asking the witness whether he removed part of the video before submitting it?
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:27 p.m.
The witness just told you he removed part of the video before submitting it
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:27 p.m.
You are asking him if that action constitutes 'editing'
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:27 p.m.@bommes
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:28 p.m.
So the witness is fully competent on the word editing when you ask, yet when I ask he acts like he has no clue what it means?
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:28 p.m.
I asked if it had been altered or edited in any way, and he told this court that it hadn't. You've just asked him if trimming a clip constitutes editing, how is he supposed to know that
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:28 p.m.
If he doesn't know what the word editin means, how can we actually know the video is authentic? Seeing as you used the lack of editing to get the video admitted.
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:28 p.m.
editing*
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:28 p.m.
If he says no, you'll pull up the tazmanian dictionary and perjur him
Fliply27If he doesn't know what the word editin means, how can we actually know the video is authentic? Seeing as you used the lack of editing to get the video admitted.
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:29 p.m.
He never said he didn't know what it means, but you're asking him if trimming constitutes editing
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:29 p.m.
I know what murder is, but does throwing a banana at someone and they fall off a cliff when they had just been shouting at me, constitute murder? Idfk
bommes 2025-05-11 01:29 p.m.
Can someone link me to the message where he initially said it wasn’t edited
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:29 p.m.
Yes please hold
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:30 p.m.
huddy.I know what murder is, but does throwing a banana at someone and they fall off a cliff when they had just been shouting at me, constitute murder? Idfk
bommes 2025-05-11 01:30 p.m.
uh no because that would be manslaughter, but jokes aside I’m going to check some things first
bommesuh no because that would be manslaughter, but jokes aside I’m going to check some things first
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:31 p.m.
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:31 p.m.
i feel very strongly about this
bommes 2025-05-11 01:31 p.m.
I must say that when James asked “has it been altered or edited in any way ”, they could have inferred that trimming would constitute editing. Technical lingo aside. My question is why did he not initially state it when asked
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:32 p.m.
Because the video has not been edited or altered in any way
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:32 p.m.
The video presented here is a 23 second clip presenting events at a certain time
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:32 p.m.
it hasn't been edited
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:32 p.m.
An original clip lasting 2 hours may have been edited, but the 23 second video clip has not been edited
huddy.Because the video has not been edited or altered in any way
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:32 p.m.
The witness just stated he trimmed the video
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:32 p.m.
That means he edited the 2 hour clip
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:33 p.m.
Not the 23 second one that is presented in front of this court
bommes 2025-05-11 01:33 p.m.
The actual clip hasn’t, no, but if I’m on the right track, Flip is asking whether potential crucial elements have not been left out as a result of the trimming(edited)
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:33 p.m.
Thats where I'm getting, yes
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:34 p.m.
Ok sure ask the Defendant that
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:34 p.m.
and he can debunk that
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:34 p.m.
But like considering this is a case about someone dropping Plaintiff off a bridge, I am exited to here what crucial elements could possibly exist
huddy.and he can debunk that
bommes 2025-05-11 01:35 p.m.
So does that mean you withdraw your initial objection?
bommesSo does that mean you withdraw your initial objection?
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:35 p.m.
No
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:35 p.m.
I objected to him asking witness to say whether trimming is editing
bommes 2025-05-11 01:35 p.m.
Ok, just wanting to make sure
huddy. 2025-05-11 01:35 p.m.
he can ask anything but that
bommes 2025-05-11 01:36 p.m.
Objection sustained. I’ll strike the question and answer but I will allow him to rephrase
bommes 2025-05-11 01:37 p.m.
cc: @Evexom @huddy.
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:41 p.m.
Do you know what the word "editing" means? @NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 01:58 p.m.
In my knowledge, editing is changing things in the video itself like sound or special effects or actions.
NEW4RKIn my knowledge, editing is changing things in the video itself like sound or special effects or actions.
Evexom 2025-05-11 02:03 p.m.
So you're saying that removing the beginning or end of a video, what you did, wouldn't qualify as editing in your view?
Fliply27So you're saying that removing the beginning or end of a video, what you did, wouldn't qualify as editing in your view?
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 02:26 p.m.
No, that would be defined as trimming.
NEW4RKNo, that would be defined as trimming.
Evexom 2025-05-11 02:47 p.m.
But you did make a change to the video, you removed part of it, right?
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 03:21 p.m.
Indeed, I removed a large chunk of just me standing around doing things unrelated to the case, not in the viscinity of Defendant, and trimmed to present to the court only the bit that includes my death and the interaction with Defendant leading up to it.
bommes 2025-05-11 04:43 p.m.@Evexom ^
bommesEvexom 2025-05-11 04:50 p.m.
At work rn ill handle it once im off
Fliply27At work rn ill handle it once im off
bommes 2025-05-11 04:56 p.m.
Alright
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 08:26 p.m.
whatever I just sent it was for dms with someone
NEW4RK 2025-05-11 08:26 p.m.
do apologise
Evexom 2025-05-11 08:57 p.m.
Pursuant to Chamber Rules 2.01 messages to not be deleted. Can you provide the log of the deletion here? @bommes
NEW4RKIndeed, I removed a large chunk of just me standing around doing things unrelated to the case, not in the viscinity of Defendant, and trimmed to present to the court only the bit t...
Evexom 2025-05-12 02:41 a.m.
So you made the decision, on your own, to remove everything except the portion you personally thought was relevant?
Fliply27Pursuant to Chamber Rules 2.01 messages to not be deleted. Can you provide the log of the deletion here? @bommes
bommes 2025-05-12 06:45 a.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-12 06:57 a.m.
Fliply27So you made the decision, on your own, to remove everything except the portion you personally thought was relevant?
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 07:00 a.m.
No, I got together with my family, and cut out everything which didn't show an interaction with Defendant to do with the case or anything relevant to the case. I assure you I did not cut out anything in which I had committed anything worthy of being detained by Defendant and dropped off a bridge.
bommesClick to see attachment.
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 07:04 a.m. 
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 07:04 a.m.@bommes Your Honor I genuinly did not mean to send that here, I know it looks like I was trying to be funny but I do take this seriously and meant to send this to my friend.
bommes 2025-05-12 07:44 a.m.
Well I can’t see any sort of intent, if you meant for any of us to see it you would’ve left it here(edited)
bommes 2025-05-12 07:45 a.m.
So I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt this time. Please double check the recipient next time
bommes 2025-05-12 07:45 a.m.@NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 07:45 a.m.
Thank you again, and apologies.
huddy. 2025-05-12 07:46 a.m.@bommes Please may you instruct counsel to get a move on
huddy. 2025-05-12 07:46 a.m.
We've spent ample time on this witness on futile matters
huddy. 2025-05-12 07:46 a.m.
It's a commonly used tactic to stall and allow the magistrate to forget the real matters of the case
huddy. 2025-05-12 07:47 a.m.
Which I would personally find terribly insulting but that's just me
bommes 2025-05-12 07:47 a.m.@Evexom How much longer do you intend to cross examine the witness exactly? We don’t have infinite time
bommesEvexom 2025-05-12 11:53 a.m.
Until I’m done
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:06 p.m.@bommes So counsel has time to respond with witty comments but not to question witness
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:06 p.m.
interesting
Fliply27Until I’m done
bommes 2025-05-12 12:16 p.m.
That’s not an answer to my question.
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-12 12:20 p.m.
Yes, apologiese for not continuing to question the witness when they answered my question at 4am. He'll get the next question in a minute
bommes 2025-05-12 12:22 p.m.
For the sake of this trial I’m imposing a timer on this particular cross examination.
Keeping in mind availability and irregular schedules, you have untilFriday, May 16, 2025 at 12:00 p.m. to complete your examination or until you finish your questioning. Whichever comes first.
It’s been well over a week since then since you began your cross examination altogether.
cc:@Evexom @huddy. (edited)
Keeping in mind availability and irregular schedules, you have until
It’s been well over a week since then since you began your cross examination altogether.
cc:
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:23 p.m.
Its been four days
bommes 2025-05-12 12:23 p.m.
Yes, I say by then
bommes 2025-05-12 12:23 p.m.
By then it will have been 8 days
NEW4RKNo, I got together with my family, and cut out everything which didn't show an interaction with Defendant to do with the case or anything relevant to the case. I assure you I did n...
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:23 p.m.
So the Judge hasn't seen everything that happened, have they?
Fliply27So the Judge hasn't seen everything that happened, have they?
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:27 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:27 p.m.
Objection
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:27 p.m.
Vague
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:27 p.m.
What the hell is this supposed to mean
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:27 p.m.
My client was on roblox for who knows how many hours
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:27 p.m.
Of course the Judge hasn't seen everything that ever happened
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:27 p.m.
It means exactly what is says
Fliply27It means exactly what is says
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:28 p.m.
You haven't even specified on what day
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:28 p.m.
Or what this even pertains to, whether that's Clark county shenanigans or the death of the Pope in 1872
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:28 p.m.
Please rephrase your question.
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:28 p.m.
No
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:29 p.m.
Also Pop Pius IX didn't die in 1872, he died in 1878
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:29 p.m.
Pope*
huddy.bommes 2025-05-12 12:35 p.m.
Sustained. Please rephrase the question to be less broad.
@Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:36 p.m.
You didn't submit the full, original recording to the Court, correct? @NEW4RK
Fliply27You didn't submit the full, original recording to the Court, correct? @NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 12:37 p.m.
Correct, I did not submit the full 2 hour recording to the court as it was not relevant.
NEW4RKCorrect, I did not submit the full 2 hour recording to the court as it was not relevant.
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:38 p.m.
So you make a unilateral decision about what the Court should and shouldn't see, correct?
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:38 p.m.
made *
Fliply27So you make a unilateral decision about what the Court should and shouldn't see, correct?
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 12:40 p.m.
Yes, funnily enough, I, alongside anybody who has ever submitted evidence in discovery, made a decision on what to submit to the court.
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:40 p.m.
You didn't submit the full recording and allow the Court to determine what was relevant, you decided that yourself, didn't you?
Fliply27You didn't submit the full recording and allow the Court to determine what was relevant, you decided that yourself, didn't you?
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:41 p.m.@NEW4RK
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:41 p.m.
Objection @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:41 p.m.
Asked and answered
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:41 p.m.
And compound question
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:41 p.m.
Its not compound?
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:42 p.m.
And I haven't asked this so I don't know what you're on about
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:42 p.m.
What is this goofy ahh line of questioning bro - just ask him if theres something incriminating him prior to the beginning of the clip
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:42 p.m.
stop with these random ahh 'did you decide yourself' no bro he consulted with his extended family before submitting it
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:43 p.m.
called his cousin twice remove to confirm
bommes 2025-05-12 12:43 p.m.
okay before you bring his whole bloodline into this I’m gonna stop you there
bommes 2025-05-12 12:43 p.m.@Evexom How exactly does this question:
Fliply27You didn't submit the full, original recording to the Court, correct? @NEW4RK
bommes 2025-05-12 12:44 p.m.
.
bommes 2025-05-12 12:44 p.m.
differ from this one:
Fliply27You didn't submit the full recording and allow the Court to determine what was relevant, you decided that yourself, didn't you?
bommes 2025-05-12 12:44 p.m.
.
bommes 2025-05-12 12:44 p.m.
mainly the first part
bommesmainly the first part
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:47 p.m.
My first question established the foundation that the full video has not been submitted, the second question is challenging the witnesses credibility and fairness of that decision by point out that the Plaintiff acted as a gatekeeper instead of giving the Court all the evidence and letting them decide what is or isn't relevant.
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:47 p.m.
Pointing out*
bommes 2025-05-12 12:54 p.m.
I just don’t see the difference from comparison of the two. They are pretty identical to me.
I’ll sustain the objection but you may rephrase if you wish.
@Evexom
I’ll sustain the objection but you may rephrase if you wish.
Evexom 2025-05-12 12:55 p.m.
You didn't allow the Court to determine what was relevant, you decided that yourself, didn't you?
@NEW4RK
Fliply27So you made the decision, on your own, to remove everything except the portion you personally thought was relevant?
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:57 p.m.
Objection @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:57 p.m.
Asked and answered
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:57 p.m.
Sorry I'm objecting to the question just asked and referring to the question I responded to
huddy. 2025-05-12 12:58 p.m.
Come on
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:01 p.m.
Your Honor, I understand why opposing counsel may this this objection in needed, but this question is not a repetition, its a refinement. The earlier questioned addressed who made the decision to remove the material. This question addressed what was denied to the Court as a result of that decision, primarily the Court's ability to determine what was relevant.
It's not the same question, it's building on the prior answer to highlight the consequences of that selective submission
It's not the same question, it's building on the prior answer to highlight the consequences of that selective submission
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:01 p.m.
may think this objection is needed *
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:02 p.m.
It was already established that Plaintiff decided to remove everything except what he thought was relevant
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:02 p.m.
Not the court
bommes 2025-05-12 01:05 p.m.
I’ll allow this, but if this leads to us running in circles I’ll strike it without hesitation
bommesI’ll allow this, but if this leads to us running in circles I’ll strike it without hesitation
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:06 p.m.
This'll probably be my last question in this line.
Fliply27You didn't allow the Court to determine what was relevant, you decided that yourself, didn't you? @NEW4RK
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:06 p.m.@NEW4RK
Fliply27You didn't allow the Court to determine what was relevant, you decided that yourself, didn't you? @NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 01:06 p.m.
No, once again I didn't.
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:08 p.m.
You testified that you were at Lander Bridge at approximately 14:42 on March 11th, correct?
@NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 01:18 p.m.
Correct
NEW4RKCorrect
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
But the video you submitted, Exhibit A, is timestamped at 19:11, isn't it?
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 01:21 p.m.
I am five hours ahead of the EST timezone as I am in BST timezone.(edited)
Fliply27But the video you submitted, Exhibit A, is timestamped at 19:11, isn't it?
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 01:22 p.m.
Correct.
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:23 p.m.
You didn't mention that you were in a different time zone when you first testified to the 14:42 timestamp, did you? @NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-12 01:24 p.m.
I didn't need to, I testified that it was around 14:42 EST. It was around 14:42 EST...
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:24 p.m.@bommes Your Honor
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:24 p.m.
I'm gonna object to relevance although the question was debunked and responded to
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
Counsel is on a fishing expedition
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
This is all relevant
huddy.Counsel is on a fishing expedition
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
How so?
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
You tell me how it isn't
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:26 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:26 p.m.
Please
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:29 p.m.
Your Honor, respectfully, this is not a fishing expedition. The Plaintiff testified that the incident occurred at 14:42 Eastern Time. The video submitted as Exhibit A, which the Plaintiff authenticated and asked the Court to rely on, is timestamped 19:11. That's a significant discrepancy.
I'm entitled to explore whether the video depicts the event the Plaintiff claims it does, and whether his timeline is credible. That goes directly to relevance, authenticity, and the weight of the evidence. This line of question is not only relevant, it's foundational.
The Plaintiff made time a material fact in his testimony. That that own evidence contradicts his timeline, I'm entitled to confront that contradiction.
I'm entitled to explore whether the video depicts the event the Plaintiff claims it does, and whether his timeline is credible. That goes directly to relevance, authenticity, and the weight of the evidence. This line of question is not only relevant, it's foundational.
The Plaintiff made time a material fact in his testimony. That that own evidence contradicts his timeline, I'm entitled to confront that contradiction.
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:30 p.m.
'That's a significant discrepancy'
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:30 p.m.
have you ever heard of a timezone bro
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:30 p.m.
Plaintiff never stated that it occured at 14:42 his time, he stated EST
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:34 p.m.
Even if the Plaintiff is 5 hours ahead, which I doubt as why would we use EST, that still leaves over half an hour discrepancy in he testimony.
My line of questioning isn't about time zones, it's about the internal consistency between the Plaintiff's sworn timeline and the timestamp of his own submitted evidence. That goes to credibility, foundation, and the evidentiary value of Exhibit A.
It is not for opposing counsel to decide whether the discrepancy matters, it's for the Court. But I have a right to question the witness about it, especially when the Plaintiff's own evidence appears to conflict with his testimony.
My line of questioning isn't about time zones, it's about the internal consistency between the Plaintiff's sworn timeline and the timestamp of his own submitted evidence. That goes to credibility, foundation, and the evidentiary value of Exhibit A.
It is not for opposing counsel to decide whether the discrepancy matters, it's for the Court. But I have a right to question the witness about it, especially when the Plaintiff's own evidence appears to conflict with his testimony.
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:34 p.m.@bommes May we please get a ruling so I can proceed?
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:44 p.m.
Plaintiff stated ‘around 14:42’ - you cannot seriously blame him for being half an hour out on an incident that occured ample days ago
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:48 p.m.
Your Honor, respectfully, Opposing Counsel cannot have it both ways. The Plaintiff gave a specific time, 14:42 Eastern Time, and authenticated a video as depicting that exact incident. The video is timestamped 19:11. That's not a minor deviation, that's nearly a five hour gap.
Now we're being told that the Plaintiff meant "around 14:42," and that a 30+ minute discrepancy is irrelevant. But that only supports my point: There is inconsistency, and I'm entitled to explore that. If the timeline is flexible, and the evidence doesn't match it, that goes directly to credibility and the weight the Court should assign Exhibit A.
The Plaintiff cannot ask the Court to rely on a video to prove their case, and then claim precision doesn't matter when it doesn't match their story.
Now we're being told that the Plaintiff meant "around 14:42," and that a 30+ minute discrepancy is irrelevant. But that only supports my point: There is inconsistency, and I'm entitled to explore that. If the timeline is flexible, and the evidence doesn't match it, that goes directly to credibility and the weight the Court should assign Exhibit A.
The Plaintiff cannot ask the Court to rely on a video to prove their case, and then claim precision doesn't matter when it doesn't match their story.
huddy. 2025-05-12 01:51 p.m.
Ok so your first paragraph is completely invalid - can you please look up what a timezone is? There is no five hour gap, there is a 0 hour gap as Plaintiff told the time in EST, doesn’t mean he is in EST.
There is no inconsisency whatsoever - Plaintiff is not expected to remember the exact time when the incident occured a long time ago Your Honor, it’s in Exhibit A.
There is no inconsisency whatsoever - Plaintiff is not expected to remember the exact time when the incident occured a long time ago Your Honor, it’s in Exhibit A.
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:56 p.m.
Your Honor, Plaintiff testified the incident occurred at 14:42 EST. The video they submitted is timestamped 19:11. If both are in EST, that's nearly a five hour gap. If the video is in BST, as the Plaintiff previously claimed, that still leaves over 30 minutes unaccounted for. Either way, there's a discrepancy.
The Plaintiff authenticated that video as depicting the incident at 14:42, that's in the record. Now the timeline doesn't match, and we're being told it doesn't matter. But they've relief on that video as critical evidence. When the foundation for evidence is inconsistent with testimony, it's absolutely proper for me to explore that, not to attack memory, but to test reliability and credibility.
I'm not asking for the Court to draw a conclusion yet. I'm simply asking to complete this line of cross examination so the Court has a full picture before assigning weight to Exhibit A.
The Plaintiff authenticated that video as depicting the incident at 14:42, that's in the record. Now the timeline doesn't match, and we're being told it doesn't matter. But they've relief on that video as critical evidence. When the foundation for evidence is inconsistent with testimony, it's absolutely proper for me to explore that, not to attack memory, but to test reliability and credibility.
I'm not asking for the Court to draw a conclusion yet. I'm simply asking to complete this line of cross examination so the Court has a full picture before assigning weight to Exhibit A.
Evexom 2025-05-12 01:57 p.m.@bommes
bommes 2025-05-12 02:04 p.m.
Right. While we’re all familiar with the concept of timezones, I am not familiar with instances where time is something and a half hour(s) off.
I’m throwing the 5 hour gap theory out the window as it is very much plausible the time shown in the clip and the time stated by the witness differ due to, as stated and hopefully familiar to everyone in this courtroom: timezones.
That leaves us with a half hour gap. And while it may not seem like a big deal to one party, and where the other party might hope to strike paydirt (hoping to find something within the “gap”). This court has a duty to support fact-finding to the best of its abilities. This is a personal opinion and should not be taken as some sort of precedent.
As such I am allowing defence counsel to explore the avenue of those “missing” 30 minutes. Should it prove futile, then it supports the witness’ point. I see no reason to deny the request at this time.
cc:@Evexom @huddy. (edited)
I’m throwing the 5 hour gap theory out the window as it is very much plausible the time shown in the clip and the time stated by the witness differ due to, as stated and hopefully familiar to everyone in this courtroom: timezones.
That leaves us with a half hour gap. And while it may not seem like a big deal to one party, and where the other party might hope to strike paydirt (hoping to find something within the “gap”). This court has a duty to support fact-finding to the best of its abilities. This is a personal opinion and should not be taken as some sort of precedent.
As such I am allowing defence counsel to explore the avenue of those “missing” 30 minutes. Should it prove futile, then it supports the witness’ point. I see no reason to deny the request at this time.
cc:
huddy. 2025-05-12 02:10 p.m.
Fair enough
NEW4RKI didn't need to, I testified that it was around 14:42 EST. It was around 14:42 EST...
Evexom 2025-05-12 02:11 p.m.
BST is five hours ahead of Eastern Time, correct?
Fliply27BST is five hours ahead of Eastern Time, correct?
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:18 p.m.
Objection
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:18 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:18 p.m.
Vague
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:19 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time? Eastern Time Zone? Januar bis Mai? June to Autumn?
Evexom 2025-05-12 04:20 p.m.14
With all due respect counselor, are you a fucking retard?
14Evexom 2025-05-12 04:24 p.m.
I withdraw.
Fliply27I withdraw.
Evexom 2025-05-12 04:25 p.m.
The question to the witness, not asking counselor if hes retarded
Evexom 2025-05-12 04:25 p.m.@NEW4RK BST is 6 hours ahead of EST, correct?
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:29 p.m.@Evexom Just because you are ignorant, doesn’t mean you should insult others. At different points in the year, BST can be 6, 5 and 4 hours ahead of EST. Your conduct and ignorance is shameful.
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:29 p.m.
actual joke
Evexom 2025-05-12 04:29 p.m.
Yap
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:29 p.m.
And don’t ask questions when I’m objecting
Evexom 2025-05-12 04:29 p.m.
Let the witness answer teh questionn
bommes 2025-05-12 05:15 p.m.
Withdrawing it doesn’t mean it’s excused. Another outburst like that and it’s contempt. Disagreement should not spiral into verbal assaults.
@Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-12 05:15 p.m.
I didn't withdraw it
Fliply27With all due respect counselor, are you a fucking retard?
bommes 2025-05-12 05:15 p.m.
.
Fliply27I withdraw.
bommes 2025-05-12 05:15 p.m.
.
Fliply27The question to the witness, not asking counselor if hes retarded
Evexom 2025-05-12 05:15 p.m.
.
Evexom 2025-05-12 05:15 p.m.
I withdrew my question to the witness
bommes 2025-05-12 05:17 p.m.
That’s… bold
bommes 2025-05-12 05:17 p.m.
regardless, don’t call opposing counsel a fucking retard please
bommes 2025-05-12 05:18 p.m.
ANYHOW
bommes 2025-05-12 05:19 p.m.
While I understand what plaintiff’s counsel is getting at, it’s very easy to infer which timezone is observed by a simple google search, thus I’m overruling the objection
cc:@Evexom @huddy.
cc:
Fliply27Evexom 2025-05-12 05:20 p.m.@NEW4RK
Fliply27NEW4RK 2025-05-13 04:01 a.m.
No it’s not, it’s five hours ahead.
NEW4RK 2025-05-13 05:25 a.m.
`
huddy. 2025-05-13 06:43 a.m.
Your Honor @bommes
huddy. 2025-05-13 06:43 a.m.
We move for sanctions against Defense counsel who randomly called me a 'fucking retard' and didn't even withdraw it
huddy. 2025-05-13 06:43 a.m.
3
Completely unprovoked, as I simply made an objection and didn't even attack anything he said, let alone himself
3huddy.We move for sanctions against Defense counsel who randomly called me a 'fucking retard' and didn't even withdraw it
bommes 2025-05-13 07:49 a.m.
3
He's been warned and is now on thin ice. Any further outbursts will result in contempt
3huddy. 2025-05-13 07:51 a.m.3
Thank you Your Honor.
3NEW4RKNo it’s not, it’s five hours ahead.
Evexom 2025-05-13 01:09 p.m.
EST is UTC-5, correct?
Evexom 2025-05-13 05:22 p.m.@bommes With how long it's taking the witness to answer these questions, we ask our deadline for cross be expanded
Fliply27bommes 2025-05-13 05:23 p.m.
I understand that, but I can not force a witness to flip their schedule for what is, in essence, a glorified zoom court without the cameras
bommes 2025-05-13 05:24 p.m.
However I'll be accomodating. Do you have any idea how many more questions you intend to ask
bommesHowever I'll be accomodating. Do you have any idea how many more questions you intend to ask
Evexom 2025-05-13 05:25 p.m.
Honestly depends on the answers I get from the witness, but I just have a few more points to hit
Fliply27Honestly depends on the answers I get from the witness, but I just have a few more points to hit
bommes 2025-05-13 05:26 p.m.
I'm willing to add the coming weekend to the deadline and we'll go from there. Let's hope it's not needed
Evexom 2025-05-13 05:26 p.m.
Fliply27EST is UTC-5, correct?
bommes 2025-05-13 05:27 p.m.@NEW4RK Please reply to the posed question at your earliest convenience
bommes 2025-05-13 05:27 p.m.
(I understand you have school, potentially work, but I would like to keep it moving for everyone's sake)
Fliply27EST is UTC-5, correct?
NEW4RK 2025-05-14 04:50 a.m.
I’m not familiar with UTC timezones but I believe so, yes.
NEW4RKI’m not familiar with UTC timezones but I believe so, yes.
Evexom 2025-05-14 02:35 p.m.
BST is UTC+1, correct?
NEW4RK 2025-05-14 02:39 p.m.
I don't know
NEW4RK 2025-05-14 02:39 p.m.
idk shit abt utc
billy (disabled account) 2025-05-14 05:30 p.m. 
billy (disabled account) 2025-05-14 05:30 p.m.2
Do you guys like my doggy
2bommes 2025-05-14 08:04 p.m.@Evexom Witness says they do not have the “expertise” to answer your question
bommes 2025-05-14 08:04 p.m.
They forgot to tag you so I reckon I do it
bommeshuddy. 2025-05-15 02:49 a.m.
It's not so much that, I don't think he's playing dumb
huddy. 2025-05-15 02:49 a.m.
But realistically how the hell is he meant to know these random things
Evexom 2025-05-15 03:21 a.m.
The timestamp on the video you submitted doesn't match up with your testimony, does it?
@NEW4RK
NEW4RK 2025-05-15 07:09 a.m.
Incorrect.
NEW4RK 2025-05-15 07:09 a.m.@Evexom
bommes 2025-05-15 12:32 p.m.@Evexom
bommes 2025-05-15 04:51 p.m.@Evexom At this rate I don't see why I should allow an extension when you're online but not replying for... what is it.. nearly 10 hours
Evexom 2025-05-15 04:52 p.m.
YES APOLOGIES HOWEVER IT IS MY SISTERS BIRTHDAY TODAY SO IM BUSY, AS WELL AS THE FACT THAT MESSAGE WAS SENT AT 4AM
Evexom 2025-05-15 04:52 p.m.
SO YOULL GET A RESPONSE WHEN YOU GET ONE
bommes 2025-05-15 04:59 p.m.
No need to yell. Happy birthday, but I would've appreciated some sort of notice that your replies were going to be delayed
bommes 2025-05-15 04:59 p.m.
So that we could've prevented... this
NEW4RKIncorrect.
Evexom 2025-05-16 01:06 a.m.
So you're saying the timestamp of 14:42 EST, which adjusted to your time based on your own testimony would be 19:42, matches up with the timestamp on the video which is 19:11?
Evexom 2025-05-16 01:07 a.m.
Let me rephrase that, could be a bit confusing
Evexom 2025-05-16 01:08 a.m.
So you're saying that you testified the time of 14:42 EST, which adjusted to your time zone based on your own testimony would be 19:42, matches up with the timestamp on Exhibit A, which is 19:11, correct?
Fliply27So you're saying that you testified the time of 14:42 EST, which adjusted to your time zone based on your own testimony would be 19:42, matches up with the timestamp on Exhibit A, ...
NEW4RK 2025-05-16 08:50 a.m.
Yes.
huddy. 2025-05-16 11:59 a.m.@bommes Your Honor this is absurd
huddy. 2025-05-16 11:59 a.m.
We all have lives yet we find the time to send five word messages in this channel
huddy. 2025-05-16 12:00 p.m.
Defense counsel has absolutely no defense as there is nothing to pick upon, so he chooses a random point and then goes inactive to try and make it have an impact
huddy. 2025-05-16 12:00 p.m.
He is stalling for time, even though Defendant promptly responds, and you yourself set a timeframe which expired 36 seconds ago.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1351423182376013917/1371522895565557774
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1351423182376013917/1371522895565557774
huddy. 2025-05-16 12:08 p.m.
Online for the past 45 minutes, clearly stalling
bommes 2025-05-16 12:13 p.m.@Evexom We don't have all eternity. I did set a deadline and I did expand on it but I also am not planning to keep this going forever
Evexom 2025-05-16 12:14 p.m.
I legit just woke up,
Evexom 2025-05-16 12:14 p.m.
I don’t need any more cross but I do ask for a continuance so I can send a motion
Fliply27I don’t need any more cross but I do ask for a continuance so I can send a motion
bommes 2025-05-16 12:20 p.m.
How much time do you need
Evexom 2025-05-16 12:21 p.m.
I’ll try and have it in by tonight
Fliply27I’ll try and have it in by tonight
bommes 2025-05-16 12:22 p.m.
tonight? that's like what, 9 hours?
Evexom 2025-05-16 12:23 p.m.
Well I am about to head into work
Evexom 2025-05-16 12:23 p.m.
I’ll be off in around 13 hours
Evexom 2025-05-16 12:23 p.m.
At which point I’ll be able to write the motion and submit it
bommes 2025-05-16 12:24 p.m.
mmmm well I can't reasonably expect you to work and draft that motion at the same time
bommes 2025-05-16 12:24 p.m.
Is 14 hours sufficient?
huddy. 2025-05-16 01:15 p.m.
Oh come on
huddy. 2025-05-16 01:15 p.m.
This is going to go on for weeks
huddy.This is going to go on for weeks
bommes 2025-05-16 02:30 p.m.
He said he is done with cross and he wants a motion submitted. I can't possibly expect him to work and type up a motion at the same time.
huddy. 2025-05-16 02:48 p.m.
Your Honor he chose to make the commitment and take this job, he shouldn't have a job IRL then
huddy. 2025-05-16 02:49 p.m.
but ok
Evexom 2025-05-16 03:04 p.m.
I reiterate the question I previously asked opposing counsel
huddy. 2025-05-16 04:19 p.m.@bommes Sanctions?
huddy.Your Honor he chose to make the commitment and take this job, he shouldn't have a job IRL then
bommes 2025-05-16 04:35 p.m.
I sincerely hope that was just an attempt at being funny
Evexom 2025-05-17 01:25 a.m.
Just got home, writing the motion now.
cc@huddy. @bommes
cc
Evexom 2025-05-17 01:25 a.m.
Its a motion to strike, just as a courtesy
NEW4RK 2025-05-17 02:46 a.m.5 months ago
bommesIs 14 hours sufficient?
NEW4RK 2025-05-17 02:46 a.m.@bommes
Evexom 2025-05-17 02:49 a.m.
womp womp
Evexom 2025-05-17 02:49 a.m.
I'm filing it right now
bommesI sincerely hope that was just an attempt at being funny
huddy. 2025-05-17 04:44 a.m.
Is calling me a retard again an attempt to be funny?
huddy.Your Honor he chose to make the commitment and take this job, he shouldn't have a job IRL then
bommes 2025-05-17 05:41 p.m.
This is what I was referring to
bommes 2025-05-17 05:41 p.m.
I do sincerely hope it was a poorly timed joke
Fliply27bommes 2025-05-17 05:45 p.m.
I see, your motion has been received
bommesThis is what I was referring to
huddy. 2025-05-18 04:50 a.m.
Would you rather I berate his shocking decision to get a job IRL and not put Roblox before that, or that I call him a retard, as he did to me a second time?
Evexom 2025-05-19 03:04 a.m.@bommes Seems like opposing counsel doesn't object to the motion. When can we expect a ruling?
huddy. 2025-05-19 07:46 a.m.@bommes Your Honor I am waiting for you to set a time frame for the response
huddy. 2025-05-19 07:46 a.m.
Please do so
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-19 11:10 a.m.
Rules of district court give 48 hours
Evexom 2025-05-19 11:10 a.m.
I recommend you read it
huddy. 2025-05-19 11:30 a.m.
why the hell would I do that
huddy. 2025-05-19 11:30 a.m.@bommes may I request an extension until thursday? I'll probably get it done tonight but then I'm away for the next 2 days(edited)
Evexom 2025-05-19 12:02 p.m.
You’ve already had two days to submit it
huddy. 2025-05-19 12:42 p.m.
Dude for hell's sake
huddy. 2025-05-19 12:42 p.m.
I'm not talking to you
huddy. 2025-05-19 12:42 p.m.
No one asked you to make these arguments
huddy. 2025-05-19 12:42 p.m.
You're just like jamie
huddy. 2025-05-19 12:42 p.m.
Please
huddy. 2025-05-19 12:42 p.m.
I don't need to make my case to you and you don't need to be responding to me when I'm not talking to you
Evexom 2025-05-19 01:12 p.m.
Be a better attorney then
Fliply27Be a better attorney then
NEW4RK 2025-05-19 01:13 p.m.
you literally crashed out in court and called him a retard
Evexom 2025-05-19 01:13 p.m.
I asked if he was retarded, I didn’t call him a retard
huddy. 2025-05-19 01:14 p.m.
You get funnier by the minute
huddy. 2025-05-19 01:15 p.m.
I wish I was as cool and popular as you are IRL
Fliply27Evexom 2025-05-20 01:46 a.m.@bommes
huddy.huddy. 2025-05-20 02:22 a.m.@bommes
Evexom 2025-05-20 02:58 a.m.
You had your chance and you blew it
bommes 2025-05-20 05:49 a.m.
right, I’m here
bommes 2025-05-20 05:51 a.m.@huddy. I have to say that the rules of procedure stipulate 48 hours for a reply. However I neglected to mention it as is customary. Then I fell off the grid for a day.
So here’s what I’m going to do: how much time do youreasonably require for a response?
So here’s what I’m going to do: how much time do you
bommeshuddy. 2025-05-20 07:21 a.m.
Can do so today
huddy.Can do so today
bommes 2025-05-20 11:50 a.m.
What is “today” though?
bommesWhat is “today” though?
huddy. 2025-05-20 11:58 a.m.
next 24 hours
huddy. 2025-05-20 11:58 a.m.
I'm at home on and off so yeah sorry, not trying to delay
huddy.I'm at home on and off so yeah sorry, not trying to delay
bommes 2025-05-20 11:59 a.m.
Can you get it done within 12? Preferably less, I want to be understanding but I’m also not keen on disregarding the rules pertaining to default deadlines entirely
huddy. 2025-05-20 04:02 p.m.
Your Honor I'm not home before 12 hours from now, at which point I will immediately submit the motion to the court
huddy. 2025-05-20 04:02 p.m.
deepest apologies
huddy. 2025-05-20 04:05 p.m.
I literally cannot get home earlier
huddy. 2025-05-21 11:10 a.m.
filing rn
Evexom 2025-05-21 12:57 p.m.@bommes Can you rule? Seeing as Plaintiff has yet to submit their response despite having five days
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:08 p.m.
Your Honor it’s been filed idk what this guy is on about
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:08 p.m.
bros making up dates just like hes making up times
huddy.Your Honor it’s been filed idk what this guy is on about
Evexom 2025-05-21 01:19 p.m.
Really? Where
Evexom 2025-05-21 01:19 p.m.
It’s not in filing-center
Evexom 2025-05-21 01:19 p.m.
It’s not on the trello card
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:20 p.m.
Dawg It's on the website
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:20 p.m.” In this case, there is a 1 hour and 31-minute time discrepancy between Plaintiff testimony of 14:41 EST, and the timestamp on the video, 19:11 BST
loving this maths btw
loving this maths btw
Evexom 2025-05-21 01:22 p.m.
This case isn’t on the website
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:23 p.m.
Oh my days we are really playing this game
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:23 p.m.
just ask me for a courtesy
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:23 p.m.
and stop whining
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:23 p.m.
I'm not even required to submit a courtesy
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:23 p.m.
but ok
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:23 p.m.
Evexom 2025-05-21 01:34 p.m.
I never asked for a courtesy. I just asked you to file the case like you said you would
Evexom 2025-05-21 01:35 p.m.@bommes We move for leave to file a surreply
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:49 p.m.
Your Honor we object
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:49 p.m.
Defense counsel should be made to watch first grade addition videos before he be allowed to make up math problems with false solutiond again
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:49 p.m.
Although he is australian so it might just be who he is
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:50 p.m.
bunch of uneducated bricklayers they are but thats that
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:51 p.m.
fun fact: they are all descended from prisoners
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:51 p.m.
who im sure we can all agree are the scum of the earth
huddy. 2025-05-21 01:51 p.m.
but thats that
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:15 p.m.
I'm not even australian?
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:15 p.m.
Go off ig
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:32 p.m.
they lied to me
huddy.Defense counsel should be made to watch first grade addition videos before he be allowed to make up math problems with false solutiond again
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:44 p.m.
I’m plenty good at first grade addition for the record
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
Oh my days
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
Ok first tell me where you live
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
so I can explain this to you better
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
countrywise
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
and if its america, i need a coast
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
5+1=6
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
You don't understand bro
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
timezones change
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:45 p.m.
throughout the year
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
he's 'british summer time' now
NEW4RK 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
u think he was 'british summer time' in spring
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
??
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
So he lied on the record?
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
No
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
He said that 19:11 was BST
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
Look it up bro
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
LOOK IT UP PLS FFS
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m.
And the 14:42 was EST
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:46 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
sorry for the flashbang
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
whats 14:42 plus 5
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
take a wild guess
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
ik its difficult
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
EST is 6 hours behind BST
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
you got this flipson bro i believe in you
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
no its not
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
it just isnt
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
isntead of looking up how utc is in relation and how btc is in relation, go on google and look up
HOW MANY HOURS BEHIND IS EST FROM BST
HOW MANY HOURS BEHIND IS EST FROM BST
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:47 p.m.
my fucking word
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:48 p.m.
That says ET, not EST
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:48 p.m.
Look at the picture I sent
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:50 p.m.
Bro what ET is EST
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:50 p.m.
everyone knows that
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:50 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:50 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:50 p.m.
That means yours would be in the middle of the fucking ocean
huddy.Bro what ET is EST
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:56 p.m.
ET can be EST or EDT
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:57 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:57 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:57 p.m.
I'm seeing a five hour difference
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:57 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:57 p.m.
also seeing a five hour difference
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:58 p.m.
can you please stop making a fool of yourself and just accept that Plaintiff isn't trying to trick you with fake evidence taken an hour before
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:58 p.m.
So youre saying EDT and EST are the exact same and the timezone doesnt change at all in the summer?
huddy. 2025-05-21 03:58 p.m.
there's no way you're this myopic and stubborn
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:59 p.m.
If you showed the full thing, you'd see it says "Eastern Time"
Evexom 2025-05-21 03:59 p.m.
Not by timezone
huddy. 2025-05-21 04:06 p.m.
So what does that mean
huddy. 2025-05-21 04:06 p.m.
EST = ET = EDT
huddy. 2025-05-21 04:06 p.m.
If you put mongolian timezone right now and put est timezone right now, they are two different timezones, meaning they will show two different times
bommes 2025-05-21 04:51 p.m.@huddy. @Evexom At this rate I'm tempted to just slap both of you with contempt for this constant mudslinging. I expect better, maybe that is in vain but I really, truly hope it is not.
Fliply27Evexom 2025-05-21 04:51 p.m.
.
bommes 2025-05-21 04:51 p.m.
now on to whatever the hell else was filed while I was gone
bommes 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.@Evexom I feel like you've made your stance quite clear as is, whatever do you want to file a surreply for?
bommes 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.
(besides the obvious)
Evexom 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.
Well
Evexom 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.
nothing WAS filed
Evexom 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.
so
bommes 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.
okay fair enough, why do you INTEND to file a surreply
Evexom 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.
Well opposing counsel never filed anything,
Evexom 2025-05-21 04:53 p.m.
so
Evexom 2025-05-21 04:54 p.m.
I guess that is unnessecary
bommes 2025-05-21 04:58 p.m.
god I wish I could still use casetext
bommesgod I wish I could still use casetext
Evexom 2025-05-21 05:08 p.m.
well the only thing to consider is my motion so it shouldnt be too difficult
bommes 2025-05-21 05:23 p.m.
Here's my thoughts: we are unsure if the original is still in the plaintiff's possession. Arguably, even if we throw the hour-long gap out the window due to timezone differences: it can still be deemed, at the very least, worrying. Half an hour of what could be vital context is missing.
Furthermore, while an attempt was made to authenticate the evidence in line with procedure, it simply doesn't excuse the fact that the plaintiff decided to modify the video, thus presenting a dilemma to this court. The clip shows the events that are central to this trial, clear as day.
Then onto my second point: the evidence shows a deputy throwing someone who's directly under his control (in handcuffs, being restrained) off a bridge, for the life of me I can not think of even one situation where such a chain of events and the outcome would be considered "normal".
Furthermore, while an attempt was made to authenticate the evidence in line with procedure, it simply doesn't excuse the fact that the plaintiff decided to modify the video, thus presenting a dilemma to this court. The clip shows the events that are central to this trial, clear as day.
Then onto my second point: the evidence shows a deputy throwing someone who's directly under his control (in handcuffs, being restrained) off a bridge, for the life of me I can not think of even one situation where such a chain of events and the outcome would be considered "normal".
bommesHere's my thoughts: we are unsure if the original is still in the plaintiff's possession. Arguably, even if we throw the hour-long gap out the window due to timezone differences: i...
Evexom 2025-05-21 09:19 p.m.
So whats the ruling
Fliply27well the only thing to consider is my motion so it shouldnt be too difficult
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:20 a.m.
??
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:20 a.m.
I literally filed
Evexom 2025-05-22 02:20 a.m.
Where
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:20 a.m.
scroll up
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:20 a.m.
and check web
Evexom 2025-05-22 02:20 a.m.
This case isn’t on the website
bommesHere's my thoughts: we are unsure if the original is still in the plaintiff's possession. Arguably, even if we throw the hour-long gap out the window due to timezone differences: i...
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:21 a.m.
And sorry what the actual fuck is "it simply doesn't excuse the fact that the plaintiff decided to modify the video"
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:21 a.m.
Show me one singular case that has ever gone through the clark district court, nhc district court, ridgeway court, firestone court
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:21 a.m.
where a defendant submitted a 2 hour stream
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:22 a.m.
plaintiff cut a video to the incident
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:22 a.m.
he can testify that no interaction happened beforehand
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:22 a.m.
he was sitting in the back of a cop car uncuffed, therefore wasnt being arrested
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:22 a.m.
and then was dumped off a gah dayum bridge
huddy.And sorry what the actual fuck is "it simply doesn't excuse the fact that the plaintiff decided to modify the video"
huddy. 2025-05-22 02:22 a.m.
sorry for being rude
Evexom 2025-05-22 10:53 p.m.@bommes When can we expect a ruling
Evexom 2025-05-24 07:29 p.m.@bommes
Evexom 2025-05-28 08:03 p.m.@bommes Can you wake up
Evexom 2025-05-28 08:04 p.m.@acerxtro Its been nearly a week since the Plaintiff submitted their response and no ruling has been made. Can you either assign a new mag or write the ruling yourself?
acerxtro 2025-05-28 09:41 p.m.@bommes HEY!!!!!
Evexom 2025-05-29 04:38 p.m.@acerxtro We request a new magistrate
acerxtro 2025-05-29 07:45 p.m.
I’ll review and determine if I’ll just do this myself or get new magistrate
acerxtroI’ll review and determine if I’ll just do this myself or get new magistrate
Evexom 2025-05-29 08:40 p.m.
God bless
huddy. 2025-05-30 04:48 a.m.
thanks
Evexom 2025-06-03 07:19 p.m.@acerxtro @bommes
Evexom 2025-06-03 07:19 p.m.
This is ridiculous
Evexom 2025-06-03 07:19 p.m.
Come on
Evexom 2025-06-04 12:54 a.m.@Kezzera Can someone contact the medical examiners office to investigate what happened to Mr. Bommes? It's been nearly two weeks and we haven't heard from him
Kezzera 2025-06-04 01:24 a.m.
bommes is on an authorized LOA
Kezzera 2025-06-04 01:24 a.m.
he should not be relied on to do anything at this time
Kezzera 2025-06-04 01:24 a.m.
this shouldbe addressed by the presiding judge
Kezzera 2025-06-04 01:24 a.m.@acerxtro
Evexom 2025-06-04 01:36 a.m.
Would be nice if that was announced
acerxtro 2025-06-04 01:56 a.m.
amazing
acerxtro 2025-06-04 01:58 a.m.
acerxtro 2025-06-04 01:58 a.m.@Evexom @huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-04 02:48 a.m.
Thanks
Evexom 2025-06-14 08:40 p.m.@acerxtro what the fuck
Evexom 2025-06-14 08:40 p.m.
Can we PLEASE
Evexom 2025-06-14 08:40 p.m.
Get this going
Evexom 2025-06-14 08:42 p.m.
It’s been nearly a month for a motion to strike
Evexom 2025-06-14 08:42 p.m.
This is quite absurd
acerxtro 2025-06-14 11:18 p.m.
Hi this is in line for a ruling
acerxtro 2025-06-14 11:18 p.m.
We are suffering from a magistrate crisis
acerxtroWe are suffering from a magistrate crisis
Evexom 2025-06-14 11:27 p.m.
What da frig
Evexom 2025-06-14 11:27 p.m.@orange give us more mags
bommes 2025-06-18 08:29 a.m.
wait @Evexom do you guys STILL NEED THAT INITIAL OBJECTION RULED ON? HOLY SHIT
bommes 2025-06-18 02:02 p.m.
I want to make an apology to the parties in the case and their attorneys. When I went on leave I failed to properly communicate that with you and the news reached you at a later date than I would’ve liked.
I’m not infallible, as goes to show, but I do want to tell you that it was unprofessional.
However I am just as surprised as you may be that after this month long hiatus of mine (however much needed it might’ve been) the objection still hasn’t been ruled on.. as such I’m taking back control and I’ll rule on this TODAY.
cc:@Evexom @huddy.
I’m not infallible, as goes to show, but I do want to tell you that it was unprofessional.
However I am just as surprised as you may be that after this month long hiatus of mine (however much needed it might’ve been) the objection still hasn’t been ruled on.. as such I’m taking back control and I’ll rule on this TODAY.
cc:
Evexom 2025-06-18 02:05 p.m.
God bless
Evexom 2025-06-18 02:05 p.m.
Thank you
bommes 2025-06-18 02:08 p.m.
that being said though it’s been a month and I still don’t have an abundance of time so can someone give me a quick summary for context on what we were stranded on?
bommeswait @Evexom do you guys STILL NEED THAT INITIAL OBJECTION RULED ON? HOLY SHIT
huddy. 2025-06-18 02:10 p.m.
Yes pls
bommesthat being said though it’s been a month and I still don’t have an abundance of time so can someone give me a quick summary for context on what we were stranded on?
Evexom 2025-06-18 02:10 p.m.
Pending motion to strike following the conclusion of my cross and prior to the start of plaintiffs redirect
Fliply27Pending motion to strike following the conclusion of my cross and prior to the start of plaintiffs redirect
bommes 2025-06-18 02:11 p.m.
right, this was about the videoclip being trimmed correct?
bommes 2025-06-18 02:13 p.m.
ok well I have to weigh whether this evidence in its current form is more prejudicial than probative, especially with the then established time gap of what was brought down to 30 minutes after some back and forth
bommes 2025-06-18 02:15 p.m.
fact of the matter is someone that resembles the defendant can be seen throwing the plaintiff off of a bridge, I don’t see how any prior interaction or lack thereof could change that very fact
bommes 2025-06-18 02:16 p.m.
(I am unaware if we’re allowed to use usernames as a confirmation of identity in Clark or not so that’s why I’m keeping it vague)
bommes 2025-06-18 02:17 p.m.
if we are, then it seems more and more likely that, no matter what transpired prior to that clip, the defendant put himself in that position, he was in control the entire time, quite literally if I do say so myself
bommes 2025-06-18 02:18 p.m.
as such I am allowing the evidence in its current form to stand, but I have a question for the plaintiff.
bommes 2025-06-18 02:19 p.m.@NEW4RK Hello plaintiff, given the lengthy time this trial has been going on, do you still have the original/unaltered/full length video of the incident in question?
NEW4RK 2025-06-18 02:23 p.m.
I do not, it was on my old PC and I would have deleted the long original video as it would have took up alot of space, something I had lacked on that computer.
NEW4RK 2025-06-18 02:23 p.m.
Even if I had my old PC, I would not have the original footage due to the space constraints of it.
huddy. 2025-06-18 02:24 p.m.
Your Honor, with all due respect, not a case has been filed in these district courts which have utilized an entire stream gameplay video of 3 hours long; it is absurd to expect anyone to keep that on their computer. Furthermore, what possibly could have occured prior to the incident that a law enforcement officer felt it necessary to detain someone without warning, grab them, hold them off a bridge and let go...??
bommesas such I am allowing the evidence in its current form to stand, but I have a question for the plaintiff.
Evexom 2025-06-18 02:29 p.m.
We ask for a paper ruling
bommes(I am unaware if we’re allowed to use usernames as a confirmation of identity in Clark or not so that’s why I’m keeping it vague)
huddy. 2025-06-18 02:57 p.m.
Yes sir we can
Fliply27We ask for a paper ruling
bommes 2025-06-18 03:20 p.m.
Very well, give me until the end of the week to sort that out as it is still not entirely without hassle
bommes 2025-06-18 03:21 p.m.
In the meantime, do you both consent to continuing for the sake of not delaying this any longer?
huddy.Your Honor, with all due respect, not a case has been filed in these district courts which have utilized an entire stream gameplay video of 3 hours long; it is absurd to expect any...
bommes 2025-06-18 03:21 p.m.
Calm down counsel, all I did was ask him if he had it did I not?
Evexom 2025-06-18 03:22 p.m.
I rather we have the paper ruling before continuing
bommes 2025-06-18 03:22 p.m.
Okay, noted
Fliply27I rather we have the paper ruling before continuing
bommes 2025-06-18 03:23 p.m.
Are you intending to seek interlocutory appeal?
bommesCalm down counsel, all I did was ask him if he had it did I not?
huddy. 2025-06-18 03:33 p.m.
Uh
huddy. 2025-06-18 03:33 p.m.
That was not intended to sound rude or anything
huddy. 2025-06-18 03:33 p.m.
huddy. 2025-06-18 03:33 p.m.
I was just adding to what he said lol
huddy. 2025-06-18 03:33 p.m.
mb if it came across like that, i don't type well
bommesAre you intending to seek interlocutory appeal?
Evexom 2025-06-18 03:34 p.m.
Supreme Court doesn’t allow interlocutory appeals
Fliply27Supreme Court doesn’t allow interlocutory appeals
bommes 2025-06-18 03:43 p.m.
Oh, well that makes things easier for sure
bommes 2025-06-18 03:43 p.m.
I’ll get it to you as soon as I can
huddy.mb if it came across like that, i don't type well
bommes 2025-06-18 03:44 p.m.
you do have a tendency for having an interesting choice of words, but don’t worry; you are forgiven
bommes 2025-06-19 03:31 p.m.
Before I proceed any further writing my ruling/opinion on this matter, I’m going to need all of your exact timezones for research purposes, the point that was raised (the time discrepancy) requires further analysis in my opinion.
I need you all to comply with this order byJune 20, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. . Failure to do so will result in punishment including but not limited to contempt.
CC:@Evexom @huddy. @NEW4RK @billy (disabled account)
I need you all to comply with this order by
CC:
bommesBefore I proceed any further writing my ruling/opinion on this matter, I’m going to need all of your exact timezones for research purposes, the point that was raised (the time disc...
Evexom 2025-06-19 03:38 p.m.
PST
Evexom 2025-06-19 03:39 p.m.
I believe Billy is AKST
billy (disabled account) 2025-06-19 07:12 p.m.
AKST
huddy. 2025-06-20 12:01 p.m.
gmt
huddy.gmt
bommes 2025-06-20 01:13 p.m.
gmt what? I need the offset if applicable (like +2. or if none is applicable: +0)
bommesBefore I proceed any further writing my ruling/opinion on this matter, I’m going to need all of your exact timezones for research purposes, the point that was raised (the time disc...
NEW4RK 2025-06-20 01:13 p.m.
BST
bommesgmt what? I need the offset if applicable (like +2. or if none is applicable: +0)
huddy. 2025-06-20 01:13 p.m.
actually nvm im gmt + 1
NEW4RKBST
bommes 2025-06-20 01:14 p.m.
same request as above
NEW4RK 2025-06-20 01:15 p.m.
Afaik there is no offset applicable with BST
NEW4RK 2025-06-20 01:15 p.m.
it’s just BST so +0
NEW4RKAfaik there is no offset applicable with BST
bommes 2025-06-20 01:20 p.m.
there is, but that’s a story for another time
bommes 2025-06-20 01:20 p.m.
thank you all
Evexom 2025-06-21 05:38 p.m.@bommes eta on the ruling?
Fliply27bommes 2025-06-21 06:21 p.m.
it’s done, just needs to be looked over by acer
bommes 2025-06-21 06:21 p.m.
which is probably going to take ages so I ran it by another judge in the meantime
bommesit’s done, just needs to be looked over by acer
Evexom 2025-06-21 06:28 p.m.
God bless
Evexom 2025-06-21 06:28 p.m.
Thank you for the haste
Evexom 2025-06-21 06:28 p.m.
(Ignoring the month long delay)
Fliply27(Ignoring the month long delay)
bommes 2025-06-21 07:10 p.m.
lol, well it’s on @acerxtro ’s desk so we’ll see I suppose.. if nothing happens I’ll just post it
acerxtro 2025-06-21 07:10 p.m.
hi
acerxtrohi
bommes 2025-06-21 07:37 p.m.
pls review my ruling when you have time good sir 
Evexom 2025-06-21 07:38 p.m.
bommes 2025-06-21 07:38 p.m.
or if you’d like you can rule on it personally, it’s your docket after all
bommes 2025-06-22 04:53 p.m.
ruling on motion to strike tonight/today (whichever applies to you)
CC:@Evexom @huddy.
CC:
Evexom 2025-06-22 05:04 p.m.
Sounds good
bommes 2025-06-22 05:47 p.m.
I'll be truthful and say that this matter really has me divided. Don't be too surprised if it takes longer for me to rule
bommes 2025-06-22 06:36 p.m.
Ok ruling is coming now. Before I post it, I will accept that this is going to be a controversial opinion no matter how I rule.
As such I am fully expecting this to get appealed, but that's why the judicial system has appeals, to determine once and for all whether something was or was not erroneous
As such I am fully expecting this to get appealed, but that's why the judicial system has appeals, to determine once and for all whether something was or was not erroneous
bommes 2025-06-22 06:37 p.m.RULING ON DEFENSE'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT A:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iX3SrkaHSGgT3lUDeGYRMOykwPP6bnnu/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iX3SrkaHSGgT3lUDeGYRMOykwPP6bnnu/view?usp=sharing
cc:@Evexom @huddy. @acerxtro
Evexom 2025-06-22 06:39 p.m.
We will be filing a motion to reconsider in the following days
Evexom 2025-06-22 06:39 p.m.
Which we ask @acerxtro to rule on
Fliply27Which we ask @acerxtro to rule on
bommes 2025-06-22 06:40 p.m.
works for me
bommes 2025-06-22 06:40 p.m.
do you want to continue in the meantime or do you wish to wait for this to be ruled on by acer
I assume the latter, but I figure I ask anyway
I assume the latter, but I figure I ask anyway
Evexom 2025-06-22 06:41 p.m.
Given the nature of the arguments here we ask to wait until a ruling on the motion to reconsider is made
bommes used /continue
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-22 06:43 p.m. This case has been continued; it will be kept on docket until completely finished, a ruling has been made, or until a recess period has ended.
Reason
Case Continued
Pending ruling by Hon. acerxtro on the defense's motion to reconsider striking plaintiff exhibit AEvexom 2025-06-22 06:55 p.m.@bommes We also request clarification on this 
Evexom 2025-06-22 06:55 p.m.
Says the motion is denied, but then states the exhibit cannot be referenced to
Fliply27Says the motion is denied, but then states the exhibit cannot be referenced to
bommes 2025-06-22 06:57 p.m.
typographical error, I was considering two avenues in the same document and forgot to clear some text out from the other viewpoint
bommes 2025-06-22 06:57 p.m.
you can disregard everything after DENIED
bommes 2025-06-22 06:57 p.m.
alternatively i can just update it.. one second
bommes 2025-06-22 06:59 p.m.
updated
acerxtro 2025-06-22 06:59 p.m.
ok
huddy. 2025-06-23 04:05 a.m.@bommes So are we pausing??
huddy.bommes 2025-06-23 05:11 a.m.
correct
bommescorrect
huddy. 2025-06-23 05:13 a.m.
May you please set a time frame for their filing
huddy. 2025-06-23 05:13 a.m.
they have stalled long enough
bommes 2025-06-23 05:14 a.m.@Evexom When do you expect to have this motion done by? It’s already been ages and I ideally want to keep the ball rolling as much as possible
bommesEvexom 2025-06-23 11:16 a.m.
Was at work all day yesterday, going to work on the motion today
Fliply27Was at work all day yesterday, going to work on the motion today
bommes 2025-06-23 11:17 a.m.
Please try to have it in today(edited)
huddy.they have stalled long enough
Evexom 2025-06-23 03:15 p.m.
Additionally, I have not stalled this case at all
Evexom 2025-06-23 03:15 p.m.
If you have complaints over how long its taking bring that up with the court as they are the ones that took a month to rule on my motion
Evexom 2025-06-23 03:16 p.m.
No fault of bommes as he was on LOA however
bommes 2025-06-23 03:32 p.m.
well.. partially my fault since I’ve neglected to properly communicate it, but still
bommeswell.. partially my fault since I’ve neglected to properly communicate it, but still
Evexom 2025-06-23 03:49 p.m.
Weren't responsible to rule though
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:01 a.m.@bommes I request that we move on now
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:01 a.m.
It's been 3 days
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:01 a.m.
There is clearly no intention other than to stall
huddy.It's been 3 days
bommes 2025-06-25 10:09 a.m.
*2(edited)
bommeshuddy. 2025-06-25 10:10 a.m.
...
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:10 a.m.
2 days minus 8 hours and 26 minutes
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:10 a.m.
Still a long time
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:10 a.m.
this is a recurring move by the defense
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:10 a.m.
they just love to stall your honor and it's unacceptable, we urge you to move on now
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:10 a.m.
move us on*
bommes 2025-06-25 10:11 a.m.@Evexom We don't have forever, get your motion in before Thursday 23:59 PM EST or I'll lift the continuance and we'll move on
huddy. 2025-06-25 10:11 a.m.
when are yall gonna stop falling for puppy eyes bruh
acerxtro 2025-06-25 08:38 p.m.
huddy.when are yall gonna stop falling for puppy eyes bruh
bommes 2025-06-26 06:31 a.m.
lmfao
bommes 2025-06-26 06:31 a.m.@Evexom but seriously, complaint before today EoD (23:59 PM) or we’re moving on. no extensions, no exceptions
bommes 2025-06-26 06:32 a.m.
*motion
not complaint
not complaint
huddy. 2025-06-26 11:15 a.m.
the court is going to laugh its f*cking ass off at an unprofessional and disrespectful gif?
acerxtro 2025-06-26 04:45 p.m.
yes, yes it is
bommesacerxtro 2025-06-26 04:45 p.m.@Evexom NO EXCEPTIONS!!!!!!
acerxtroEvexom 2025-06-26 06:36 p.m.
Evexom 2025-06-26 06:36 p.m.
I’m at work right now PAL!!!!
Evexom 2025-06-26 06:36 p.m.
You may or may not get it on time
Evexom 2025-06-26 06:36 p.m.
But ima send it anyways even if it’s after
huddy.the court is going to laugh its f*cking ass off at an unprofessional and disrespectful gif?
Evexom 2025-06-26 06:42 p.m.
Harsh language
Evexom 2025-06-26 06:42 p.m.
So inappropriate
huddy. 2025-06-27 02:57 a.m.@bommes Your Honor this is a joke
huddy. 2025-06-27 02:57 a.m.
not only should the court no longer accept any submission
huddy. 2025-06-27 02:57 a.m.
but defense counsel should be held in contempt
huddy. 2025-06-27 02:57 a.m.
This is absurd @bommes
huddy. 2025-06-27 02:58 a.m.
He cannot keep requesting extensions and not file anything
huddy. 2025-06-27 02:58 a.m.
clearly to stall these proceedings
bommes 2025-06-27 08:11 a.m.
Yeah so I gave you ample time to submit your motion to reconsider which you failed to abide by and you gave me no advance notice of anything, so I hereby consider this continuance void and we are moving forward with proceedings.
I am rejecting the verbal motion for contempt as I believe this suffices as punishment.
I am rejecting the verbal motion for contempt as I believe this suffices as punishment.
CC:@Evexom @huddy.
bommes 2025-06-27 08:12 a.m.
Now, where were we
bommes 2025-06-27 08:14 a.m.@Evexom from what I gather you were in the middle of examination when you filed the motion to strike initially, you may continue if you wish but try not to drag it on
bommes 2025-06-27 04:45 p.m.
make your intentions known within 24h or I will assume you have yielded and we'll move on with the next examination
Evexom 2025-06-27 06:57 p.m.
My cross has already ended
Evexom 2025-06-27 06:57 p.m.
So
bommes 2025-06-27 08:09 p.m.@huddy. do you wish to call another witness
bommesEvexom 2025-06-27 09:26 p.m.
I believe he is entitled to recross
Fliply27I believe he is entitled to recross
bommes 2025-06-28 04:02 a.m.
Fine by me but I don’t want to end up in an eternal loop of cross and recross
bommes 2025-06-28 03:17 p.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-29 05:05 a.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-06-29 05:06 a.m.
We call Defendant ParkRangerBilly to the stand
bommes 2025-06-29 08:47 a.m.
Alright
bommes used /administeroath
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-29 08:49 a.m.@billy (disabled account) (edited)Which type of oath would you like to swear to?
Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.
Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury. Religious Oath Non-Religious Oath
Oath Selection
billy (disabled account) 2025-06-29 10:50 a.m.
I will like the court to know I am busy working and what not and will be available for a examination on Wednesday @bommes
BotclerkFlowclerkFlow Bot2025-06-29 10:50 a.m.@billy (disabled account) Do you solemnly swear that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, so help you god?
Religious Oath
billy (disabled account)I will like the court to know I am busy working and what not and will be available for a examination on Wednesday @bommes
bommes 2025-06-29 10:52 a.m.
That's fine, we will try to keep that in mind
billy (disabled account) 2025-06-29 10:56 a.m.
Honestly I might not be available on Wednesday
billy (disabled account) 2025-06-29 10:57 a.m.
I might go out of town on my days off
bommes 2025-06-29 11:23 a.m.@billy (disabled account) You can answer questions when you're able, you don't have to be in-game for this
bommes 2025-06-29 11:23 a.m.
Also please say "I do." (nothing else) when you're ready to testify
bommesbilly (disabled account) 2025-06-30 12:56 a.m.
Yeah I guess :/
billy (disabled account) 2025-06-30 01:15 a.m.
Hey will you be my friend :/
billy (disabled account) 2025-06-30 01:15 a.m.
I’m a looser :/
BotclerkFlowbommes 2025-06-30 08:14 a.m.
can you complete this, you can't testify without being sworn in
bommes 2025-06-30 08:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
billy (disabled account)Hey will you be my friend :/
Offer 2025-06-30 09:36 a.m.
I will
BotclerkFlowbilly (disabled account) 2025-06-30 10:47 a.m.
Yes Mr clerkflow
huddy. 2025-07-01 10:27 a.m.
Bro
huddy. 2025-07-01 10:27 a.m.@bommes We move for contempt
huddy. 2025-07-01 10:28 a.m.
It’s been three days since Defendant was called, and he has consistently been incapable of saying ‘I do’, instead spamming whatever other illegal alrernative he can
huddy. 2025-07-01 10:28 a.m.
all defendant and his counsel can do is try to stall this case
huddy. 2025-07-01 10:28 a.m.
They should both be sent to the slammer to live the rest of their days behind bars among the criminals that they act like
bommes 2025-07-01 04:30 p.m.@billy (disabled account) I’ll make this simple, say “I do.” within 12 hours of this message or I’m fining you for violating a direct order of this court
bommes 2025-07-01 04:30 p.m.
It’s not rocket science sir
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
acerxtro 2025-07-02 02:14 a.m.@billy (disabled account)
BotclerkFlowacerxtro 2025-07-02 02:15 a.m.
you have to say "I do" or JAIL!!!
huddy. 2025-07-02 04:28 a.m.@bommes Defendant has failed to do so
huddy. 2025-07-02 04:28 a.m.
we move for the court to hold in contempt and send to alligator alcatraz
acerxtro 2025-07-02 12:10 p.m.
hey I think his account is disabled
Evexom 2025-07-02 05:19 p.m.
My client has already answered the question. I don't know why we are threatening him with contempt
acerxtro 2025-07-02 07:56 p.m.@billy (disabled account) has communicated to the court via non-verbal means 
NEW4RK 2025-07-02 07:57 p.m.
your honour
NEW4RK 2025-07-02 07:57 p.m.
is that grow a garden
NEW4RKis that grow a garden
acerxtro 2025-07-02 08:31 p.m.
yes
acerxtroyes
Evexom 2025-07-02 09:46 p.m.
Why are you larping as a mexican
bommes 2025-07-03 08:10 a.m.
I think it will come as a surprise to absolutely no one that I will not be holding the defendant in contempt since this is outside of his control (his account being disabled by discord moderation, that is).
bommes 2025-07-03 08:11 a.m.
Depending on how long this is going to take I may or may not place this case on hold pending the defendant’s return.
Any objections or concerns please put them here
CC:@Evexom @huddy.
Any objections or concerns please put them here
CC:
bommesDepending on how long this is going to take I may or may not place this case on hold pending the defendant’s return. Any objections or concerns please put them here CC: <@413354...
Evexom 2025-07-03 03:55 p.m.
No objections from me
bommesI think it will come as a surprise to absolutely no one that I will not be holding the defendant in contempt since this is outside of his control (his account being disabled by dis...
huddy. 2025-07-04 04:31 a.m.
Your Honor
huddy. 2025-07-04 04:31 a.m.
How about defendant take 3 minutes to make a new account
huddy.How about defendant take 3 minutes to make a new account
bommes 2025-07-04 06:15 a.m.
How about you realise when to can it, counsel? If you were the person being moderated and being told to "just make a new account" for one proceeding, then I'm sure you'd be unhappy as well.
huddy. 2025-07-04 10:03 a.m.
Er what
huddy. 2025-07-04 10:03 a.m.
if my account is banned
huddy. 2025-07-04 10:03 a.m.
why wouldnt i just take the initiative myself to make a new one
huddy. 2025-07-04 10:03 a.m.
how else is bro meant to continue his larp
huddy. 2025-07-04 10:03 a.m.
sitting and sobbing aint gonna do anything
huddy.why wouldnt i just take the initiative myself to make a new one
acerxtro 2025-07-04 06:53 p.m.
because that’s against discord TOS and he probably doesn’t want to risk getting his account permanently deleted
bommes 2025-07-05 10:06 a.m.
^
bommes 2025-07-05 10:07 a.m.
that too
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:35 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:35 p.m.
He never finna get unbanned for the shit he says on discord
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:36 p.m.
seeing as his testimony isn't particularly vital here since we have clearcut evidence and statements from Plaintiff, we revoke our request to question him
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:36 p.m.
and we move the court to move this to closing arguments
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:37 p.m.
I'd also like to note that we have reguarly seen the Defendant in game and he is perfectly capable of attending in-game questioning but that's that
huddy.I'd also like to note that we have reguarly seen the Defendant in game and he is perfectly capable of attending in-game questioning but that's that
bommes 2025-07-05 03:40 p.m.
we've never ordered to begin in-game proceedings/questioning so it seems unfair to hold that against him
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:40 p.m.
right
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:40 p.m.
well nevertheless we no longer wish to call him to the stand
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:40 p.m.
since we don't want to continue waiting five years
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:40 p.m.
so we request that this case proceeds to closing
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:40 p.m.
statements
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:41 p.m.
sorry my wifi is awful
bommes 2025-07-05 03:42 p.m.
Anyway, unless either of you has an objection or concern, we'll move to closing now. And by now I don't mean immediately, but it will be the next/final phase
CC:@Evexom @huddy.
huddy. 2025-07-05 03:50 p.m.
Thanks
huddy. 2025-07-07 10:38 a.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-07-07 10:38 a.m.
hi
huddy. 2025-07-07 10:38 a.m.
so can we move on now since no objection has been raised
bommes 2025-07-07 01:18 p.m.
Honestly yes, I don’t see a reason to keep waiting at this point
bommes 2025-07-07 01:18 p.m.
Alright so closing arguments!
bommes 2025-07-07 01:19 p.m.@huddy. Plaintiff, go ahead
huddy. 2025-07-07 03:30 p.m.
thanks aslee but in mrng
huddy. 2025-07-09 09:35 a.m.
Your Honor,
This is a very simple yet brutal case. The facts are extremely simple and shown by clearcut, unquestionable video footage. Defendant restrained Plaintiff against his will, for no justifiable reason, grabbed him so that Plaintiff no longer had any control over any part of his body, and threw him off a bridge. Plaintiff drowned as he struggled in the water, unable to try and swim upwards due to the handcuffs. There was no possible reason or explanation, legally or morally, as to why Defendant should have brutally murdered Plaintiff. The court should rule in favour of the Plaintiff in light of these undeniable facts and evidence.
@bommes
This is a very simple yet brutal case. The facts are extremely simple and shown by clearcut, unquestionable video footage. Defendant restrained Plaintiff against his will, for no justifiable reason, grabbed him so that Plaintiff no longer had any control over any part of his body, and threw him off a bridge. Plaintiff drowned as he struggled in the water, unable to try and swim upwards due to the handcuffs. There was no possible reason or explanation, legally or morally, as to why Defendant should have brutally murdered Plaintiff. The court should rule in favour of the Plaintiff in light of these undeniable facts and evidence.
huddy. 2025-07-09 09:36 a.m.
also apologies for the wait, was on a plane
bommes 2025-07-09 10:23 a.m.@Evexom your turn
huddy. 2025-07-09 03:51 p.m.@bommes I understand that I took longer than expected to submit our statement, but given Fliply's history of incessant time wasting, could you please just set a time boundary for the response just as a safeguard boundary, thanks
bommes 2025-07-09 03:56 p.m.@Evexom Since this doesn't concern writing a motion or doing legal research, you'll be given 24 hours unless you give me a very good reason warranting an extension
huddy.Evexom 2025-07-09 03:56 p.m.
Stop defaming me pal
bommesEvexom 2025-07-09 03:56 p.m.
Ill have it in tonight, currently working on school
Fliply27Ill have it in tonight, currently working on school
bommes 2025-07-09 03:57 p.m.
That's fine, just have it in before this time tomorrow
Evexom 2025-07-09 03:57 p.m.
huddy. 2025-07-09 04:27 p.m.@bommes Motion for sanctions against counsel
huddy. 2025-07-09 04:28 p.m.
for making baseless accusations of defamation
bommes 2025-07-09 04:53 p.m.
...no
Evexom 2025-07-10 03:47 a.m.
Your honor,
This case is not as simple as the Plaintiff would like to have you believe. Before you is unreliable testimony, one exhibit which has a timestamp starting half an hour after Plaintiff claimed the events started, and no other testimony to corroborate what the Plaintiff has said. The Plaintiff has failed to prove beyond a preponderance of the evidence, not even reaching the bar of probable cause.
Due to the inconsistent testimony, Plaintiff’s only exhibit not showing the incident in question, and nothing else to back up Plaintiff’s claim, this court has no other choice but to find the Defendant not liable on both counts.
I yield.
@bommes
This case is not as simple as the Plaintiff would like to have you believe. Before you is unreliable testimony, one exhibit which has a timestamp starting half an hour after Plaintiff claimed the events started, and no other testimony to corroborate what the Plaintiff has said. The Plaintiff has failed to prove beyond a preponderance of the evidence, not even reaching the bar of probable cause.
Due to the inconsistent testimony, Plaintiff’s only exhibit not showing the incident in question, and nothing else to back up Plaintiff’s claim, this court has no other choice but to find the Defendant not liable on both counts.
I yield.
bommes 2025-07-10 04:17 a.m.
Thank you both, I will now deliberate on how I will rule
huddy. 2025-07-10 04:18 p.m.
ty
huddy. 2025-07-21 10:02 a.m.@bommes not tryna rush you or anything but just wanted to know when this might be
huddy. 2025-07-21 10:02 a.m.
thanks
huddy. 2025-07-21 10:02 a.m.
since during this time, defendant has repeatedly harrassed and pulled over the plaintiff
krm 2025-07-21 11:20 a.m.@bommes
krm 2025-07-21 11:20 a.m.NOTICE
The supervising judge on this case has changed to shah_khaled.
krm pinned a message to this channel.2025-09-27 07:50 p.m.
huddy.since during this time, defendant has repeatedly harrassed and pulled over the plaintiff
bommes 2025-07-21 11:51 a.m.
Do you seek an order mitigating this conduct pending the outcome?
huddy. 2025-07-21 06:24 p.m.
Your Honor, my client has decided to try to spend minimal hours on clark county instead, to avoid Defendant's harrassment and bullying
huddy.bommes 2025-07-22 05:49 a.m.
I find this to be a more complex issue than originally anticipated, I want to make sure I am well-prepared and informed enough to make an adequate ruling, as outcomes can be used as precedent. I don't wish to derail proceedings with faulty findings
huddy. 2025-07-22 08:29 a.m.
I see
huddy. 2025-07-22 08:29 a.m.
No problem
huddy.since during this time, defendant has repeatedly harrassed and pulled over the plaintiff
Evexom 2025-07-22 03:17 p.m.
Maybe tell the Plaintiff to stop breaking the law
Evexom 2025-07-22 03:17 p.m.
huddy. 2025-07-22 11:02 p.m.
Really? Defendant has pulled over the Plaintiff 3 times in the last two weeks, detained him for 11 minutes for no reason and then let him go. If he had actually committed a crime, the Defendant (somebody who didn’t hesitate to drop him off a bridge) would actually book him.
bommes 2025-07-23 07:04 a.m.
Alright that’s enough, if there’s a genuine concern about harassment following this lawsuit then we’ll deal with that later.
On the other hand, you can’t expect to have the defendant just not interact with the plaintiff in his capacity as a peace officer. Crimes need to be punished
On the other hand, you can’t expect to have the defendant just not interact with the plaintiff in his capacity as a peace officer. Crimes need to be punished
bommes 2025-07-23 07:05 a.m.
That is IF he committed them, which is something I’m not going to start asking about
bommes 2025-07-26 06:07 p.m.@huddy. Question. I do not see any sort of capacity mentioned, seeing as the Solicitor General's office was also not involved: does this mean it's an individual capacity suit(edited)
bommes 2025-07-26 06:07 p.m.
?
bommeshuddy. 2025-07-26 06:17 p.m.
Yeah it's individual capacity sir
huddy. 2025-07-26 06:17 p.m.
sorry for not clarifying
bommes 2025-07-26 06:18 p.m.
alright that's good to know
Evexom 2025-08-04 07:41 p.m.@bommes hey
bommes 2025-08-05 05:18 a.m.
I’m not home currently, will be home on Thursday
bommesI’m not home currently, will be home on Thursday
Evexom 2025-08-05 01:21 p.m.
Ok
Xerxy 2025-08-05 06:20 p.m.@bommes 5 months is unacceptable, please get this finished on thursday.
XerxyEvexom 2025-08-05 06:30 p.m.
Holy yap
Xerxybommes 2025-08-05 08:00 p.m.
how about you archive my requested cases first before you come making demands
bommeshow about you archive my requested cases first before you come making demands
Xerxy 2025-08-05 08:09 p.m.
Which ones
XerxyWhich ones
bommes 2025-08-05 08:13 p.m.courtwide-requests
huddy. 2025-08-11 01:28 p.m.
hi @bommes
huddy. 2025-08-11 01:28 p.m.
bommes 2025-08-11 02:01 p.m.@huddy. Ruling has been finished for a while but @krm needs to sign off on it which he hasn’t done yet
bommes 2025-08-11 02:01 p.m.
so I went to @cabot but uh yeah
cabot 2025-08-11 02:03 p.m.@krm sign off buddy, i read through and it looks good
bommeshuddy. 2025-08-11 02:30 p.m.
ok thanks
bommes 2025-08-12 09:13 a.m.
ok since shah wont review it im posting it, technically it was reviewed already so
bommes 2025-08-12 09:18 a.m.THE DISTRICT COURT OF CLARK COUNTY Natestratt, Plaintiff, v. Parkrangerbilly, Defendant. FINAL RULING Presiding Judge: Hon. Shah_Khaled Docket Number: CV-0139-25 FINAL RULING This matter, presented before the court and having been heard in its entirety, comes now for a final ruling... 
huddy. 2025-08-12 11:16 a.m.
Thanks @bommes
huddy. 2025-08-12 11:17 a.m.
$500,000 is punitive damages presumably, would we be able to have further attorney’s fees added, worth $70,000? This case has been going on for five months with numerous documents and exchanged and a lenghy trial
bommes 2025-08-12 01:12 p.m.
Hm, I already made my ruling. You’ll have to take that out of the 500 grand
Evexom 2025-08-12 02:31 p.m.@bommes We ask you leave this case channel open, Defendant is exploring appealing this matter
Evexom 2025-08-12 02:35 p.m.
Also youre a horrible person for not indenting these two
NEW4RK 2025-08-12 05:22 p.m.@billy (disabled account) please let me know when you are next available to make payment.
NEW4RKEvexom 2025-08-12 05:34 p.m.
Dont talk to my client
Fliply27Dont talk to my client
NEW4RK 2025-08-12 05:41 p.m.
how else do you expect me to organize how and when the payment is made
NEW4RK 2025-08-12 05:41 p.m.
I don't have the ability to read minds and so I cannot telepathically communicate with him to organize the time and date
krm 2025-08-13 10:08 a.m.
Signed
bommes 2025-08-13 02:25 p.m.
Case channel will remain open
Evexom 2025-08-13 08:43 p.m.@bommes We verbally motion to stay pending Defendant's Motion to Reconsider
bommes 2025-08-13 09:00 p.m.
With all due respect counselor, you are better off directing your energy towards the potential appeal
bommes 2025-08-13 09:00 p.m.
I will not be hearing a motion to reconsider at this time
Evexom 2025-08-13 09:03 p.m.
Youre getting one either way
bommes 2025-08-13 10:02 p.m.
NEW4RK 2025-08-14 10:36 a.m.
-+
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:34 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:34 p.m.
please set a 7 day timeframe for the defenadnt to pay my client
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:34 p.m.
before he is indefinitely jailed
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:34 p.m.
because hes made no efforts so far
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:35 p.m.
and it aggravates my balls
bommes 2025-08-14 04:40 p.m.
I am freezing the timer on payment pending the appeal on this case. It saves the hassle of having to repay it should the appeal be decided in defendant’s favour.
CC:@huddy.
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:41 p.m.
your honor
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:41 p.m.
we've played this fun game 3 times in this case
huddy. 2025-08-14 04:42 p.m.
are you going to keep falling for ts
Evexom 2025-08-14 05:32 p.m.
wildly innappropriate language in front of this court
Evexom 2025-08-14 05:32 p.m.@bommes We will be submitting a motion to reconsider limited only to the payment of attorneys fees, we will save Exhibit A for appeal
bommes 2025-08-14 05:38 p.m.
You’ve had more disciplinary actions taken against you than any other practising attorney I know. Give me one good reason why I should not order you to show cause this instant.
Cc:@huddy.
Fliply27bommes 2025-08-14 05:38 p.m.
I can live with that
huddy. 2025-08-14 05:39 p.m.
uh
huddy. 2025-08-14 05:39 p.m.
what exactly is this regarding???
bommesI can live with that
Evexom 2025-08-14 05:45 p.m.
God bless
Evexom 2025-08-14 05:45 p.m.
Ill try to have it in within 72 hours
huddy.are you going to keep falling for ts
bommes 2025-08-14 05:47 p.m.
This
huddy. 2025-08-14 05:48 p.m.
is it the tone or the ts that you aren't happy with
huddy. 2025-08-14 05:48 p.m.
because ts = tis = dis = this
huddy. 2025-08-14 05:48 p.m.
not this shit
huddy. 2025-08-14 05:49 p.m.
and also its an incredibly fair question considering that the defense have repeatedly stalled the case by fooling you into giving them long time periods to file motions and extensions and then never filing them
huddy.not this shit
bommes 2025-08-14 06:19 p.m.
Uhuh…
huddy.and also its an incredibly fair question considering that the defense have repeatedly stalled the case by fooling you into giving them long time periods to file motions and extensi...
bommes 2025-08-14 06:20 p.m.
It is ultimately my decision to freeze the payout timer and scheme in general, they never motioned for it
bommes used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-15 04:56 a.m. Sunday, August 17, 2025 at 5:56 p.m. (1 month ago )
Timer
bommes 2025-08-15 04:56 a.m.@Evexom that’s all you’re getting, no extensions
bommes 2025-08-15 04:57 a.m.
I withdrew the time from when you said 72 hours so that’s why it may sound like less
bommes 2025-08-15 04:57 a.m.
72 - 11 hours ago when you said 72 hours leaves us with 61
bommes 2025-08-15 04:57 a.m.
which should still be ample
huddy. 2025-08-18 07:00 a.m.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand he fell for it again
Evexom 2025-08-18 01:07 p.m.
Was working on an impeachment case which takes importance over a disagreement over attorneys fees, it’ll be in as soon as possible.
huddy. 2025-08-18 01:09 p.m.
huddy. 2025-08-18 01:09 p.m.
no it wont son
huddy. 2025-08-18 01:09 p.m.
time is up
Evexom 2025-08-18 01:10 p.m.
Yap yap yap
huddy. 2025-08-18 01:11 p.m.
keep crying loser
Evexom 2025-08-18 01:12 p.m.
You’re the one here crashing out for no reason
bommes 2025-08-18 03:37 p.m.
You said 72 hours, I gave you 72 hours. You neglected to file said motion and thus I am denying anything posted now for failure to file by the imposed deadline
bommesYou said 72 hours, I gave you 72 hours. You neglected to file said motion and thus I am denying anything posted now for failure to file by the imposed deadline
Evexom 2025-08-18 03:40 p.m.
I understand, however the impeachment case came after I already said 72 hours.
Evexom 2025-08-18 03:41 p.m.
If I knew I was going to have that case prior to me giving the 72 hour deadline I would've asked for longer
Fliply27If I knew I was going to have that case prior to me giving the 72 hour deadline I would've asked for longer
bommes 2025-08-18 03:49 p.m.
I’m sorry but I have to stick by my decision here
bommesI’m sorry but I have to stick by my decision here
Evexom 2025-08-18 04:37 p.m.
I understand, don't agree however.
Fliply27I understand, don't agree however.
bommes 2025-08-19 02:59 a.m.
As is your right
huddy. 2025-08-23 11:48 a.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-08-23 11:48 a.m.
indef jail billy pls
huddy. 2025-08-23 11:48 a.m.
its been almost 2 weeks now
bommesI am freezing the timer on payment pending the appeal on this case. It saves the hassle of having to repay it should the appeal be decided in defendant’s favour. CC: <@98226042...
krm 2025-08-28 10:05 a.m.@𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥
bommesI am freezing the timer on payment pending the appeal on this case. It saves the hassle of having to repay it should the appeal be decided in defendant’s favour. CC: <@98226042...
𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥ 2025-08-28 10:09 a.m.
theres no appeal so the court can continue in enforcement
𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥ 2025-08-28 10:09 a.m.
cc @bommes
krm 2025-08-28 10:10 a.m.@billy (disabled account) you are hereby held in contempt until you pay the amount in the default package
krm 2025-08-28 10:11 a.m.
cc: @billy (disabled account) @huddy. @NEW4RK @Evexom
krm 2025-08-28 10:11 a.m.
the court does not appreciate you lying about an appeal too
krm used /whois discord
RoVer Bot2025-08-28 10:11 a.m. wish heading made buffalo stopped principle thread 
Open Roblox profile
parkrangerbilly#0
Roblox username
everyonehatesme1832Roblox display name
ParkRangerPuppyRoblox user ID
165064338Is banned?
NoJoin date
9/24/2016huddy. 2025-08-28 10:28 a.m.@krm @𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥ so is he being jailed forever
huddy. 2025-08-28 10:28 a.m.
just to confirm dat
huddy.krm 2025-08-28 10:28 a.m.
the order has been entered already
krm 2025-08-28 10:28 a.m.
yes
krmthe order has been entered already
huddy. 2025-08-28 10:30 a.m.
ok ty and hold fliply27 in contempt for repeatedly lying to the court about submitting motions in order to waste time
NEW4RK 2025-08-28 04:11 p.m.@billy (disabled account) again, please let me know at your earliest convenience when you are available to make payment.
NEW4RK 2025-08-31 10:36 a.m.@billy (disabled account) ^
NEW4RK 2025-09-03 05:48 a.m.@billy (disabled account) ^
bommes 2025-09-05 08:34 a.m.
Right I’m giving this one more week and then I’m archiving this. It can’t be sitting on my docket forever
bommes 2025-09-05 08:39 a.m.
?remindme 7 days Archive this case
Dyno Bot2025-09-05 08:39 a.m. 
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-06 12:26 a.m. @krabz has added @p. to the case channel.
Case Modified
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-06 12:31 a.m.DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
CC:@bommes @NEW4RK
Courtesy Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/18sJKHnK8mgzpZqMfUvKdONjl_derd469/view?usp=sharing
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-06 12:33 a.m.@bommes Your Honor, the defendant intends to comply with the default judgment order but would like to set up a payment plan (subject to the Court's approval) due to extenuating financial circumstances.
We would also like to request for release from indefinite detention in light of this.
We would also like to request for release from indefinite detention in light of this.
billy (disabled account) 2025-09-06 01:40 a.m. 
psychoIoglca1bommes 2025-09-06 06:19 a.m.
I’d like to see a proposed plan that I can sign off on before doing anything of the sort.
bommes 2025-09-06 06:20 a.m.
Secondly, the plaintiff must be able to give his opinion as well
bommes 2025-09-06 07:50 a.m.
Granted it won’t be the deciding factor, but I still would appreciate their input
Evexom 2025-09-06 12:28 p.m.
seeing as defendant has new counsel, I verbally notify this court of my withdrawal @bommes
Fliply27seeing as defendant has new counsel, I verbally notify this court of my withdrawal @bommes
bommes 2025-09-06 01:01 p.m.
withdrawal accepted
bommes used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-06 01:01 p.m. @bommes has removed @Evexom from the case channel.
Case Modified
bommesI’d like to see a proposed plan that I can sign off on before doing anything of the sort.
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-06 01:09 p.m.
Yes Your Honor - we will get into contact with the opposing party.
psychoIoglca1Yes Your Honor - we will get into contact with the opposing party.
bommes 2025-09-06 01:12 p.m.
Excellent, please inform this court if anything arises or when you've reached a mutually agreed upon plan
bommesExcellent, please inform this court if anything arises or when you've reached a mutually agreed upon plan
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-10 12:01 a.m.
Your Honor, my client is broke
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-10 12:01 a.m. 
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-10 12:02 a.m.
he needs time to work his jobs and cargo stuff — but that cannot happen if he stays in jail
psychoIoglca1he needs time to work his jobs and cargo stuff — but that cannot happen if he stays in jail
bommes 2025-09-10 03:47 a.m.
It actually can. Have an alt account do the money-making and then transfer it to him once done
bommesIt actually can. Have an alt account do the money-making and then transfer it to him once done
NEW4RK 2025-09-10 05:12 a.m.
You cannot transfer money without residency, however that does not stop the alt account dropping the money to a trusted person, perhaps their lawyer and sending from them to their main account.
NEW4RKYou cannot transfer money without residency, however that does not stop the alt account dropping the money to a trusted person, perhaps their lawyer and sending from them to their ...
bommes 2025-09-10 06:37 a.m.
That works just fine for me.
bommes 2025-09-11 01:06 p.m.@p. Counsel?
bommes 2025-09-11 01:09 p.m.
As I see it we have two options:
A) I get an approved and signed payment plan from both parties, at which point I shall grant release under the condition that any missed payments are subject to reasonable penalties to be determined at a hearing.
B) Defendant stays incarcerated while he uses an alt to gather the money, once money is collected it shall be transferred and proof be provided at which point I will grant his release and see this matter be dismissed.(edited)
A) I get an approved and signed payment plan from both parties, at which point I shall grant release under the condition that any missed payments are subject to reasonable penalties to be determined at a hearing.
B) Defendant stays incarcerated while he uses an alt to gather the money, once money is collected it shall be transferred and proof be provided at which point I will grant his release and see this matter be dismissed.(edited)
bommes 2025-09-11 01:10 p.m.
Fair warning for option A: if too many payments are missed I may decide to incarcerate again indefinitely under the pretense that defendant is not willing to commit through traditional means.
bommes 2025-09-11 01:11 p.m.
Confer with opposing counsel if you wish to pursue option A.(edited)
huddy. 2025-09-11 03:37 p.m.@bommes
huddy. 2025-09-11 03:37 p.m.
billy has been abusing mod perms to take himself out of jail
huddy. 2025-09-11 03:37 p.m.
every time he plays
huddy. 2025-09-11 03:37 p.m.
can you report this
huddy. 2025-09-11 03:37 p.m.
or hold him in contempt
bommes 2025-09-11 03:39 p.m.
Really? This is what I was afraid of
huddy. Server2025-09-11 03:42 p.m.
huddy. Server2025-09-11 03:42 p.m.
huddy. 2025-09-11 03:42 p.m.
He thinks your ruling is a joke and looks upon it with contempt
bommes 2025-09-11 06:19 p.m.
Well I just got back from that ticket I opened.
bommes 2025-09-11 06:19 p.m.
Essentially the verdict is “suck it up he’s a mod and developer that contributes significantly to the game so we’re not gonna do anything about it”(edited)
bommes 2025-09-11 06:19 p.m.@huddy.
bommes 2025-09-11 06:20 p.m.
I’m afraid my hands are tied up and I’m gagged and spat on in this situation
bommesI’m afraid my hands are tied up and I’m gagged and spat on in this situation
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-11 10:38 p.m.
your honor the defendant has acquired the funds and has transferred it to me
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-11 10:38 p.m.
i will coordinate with the plaintiff on its delivery
bommes 2025-09-12 06:39 a.m.
Whatever at this point I’ll take anything I can get
bommes 2025-09-12 06:39 a.m.
Get this sorted and end this nightmare
krm 2025-09-12 10:50 a.m.
@natestratt
psychoIoglca1your honor the defendant has acquired the funds and has transferred it to me
krm 2025-09-12 10:51 a.m.@NEW4RK can you arrange for this to be collected within the next 48hrs the court needs to take this off its docket
krm 2025-09-12 10:51 a.m.
any failure to collect funds will be regarded as forfeiture
krm 2025-09-12 10:51 a.m.
you can alternatively ask someone to collect it on your behalf (but the court will not enforce any post payment order)(edited)
NEW4RK 2025-09-12 12:07 p.m.
yess g I will arrange
bommes used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-12 12:40 p.m. Sunday, September 14, 2025 at 10:40 a.m. (2 weeks ago )
Timer
bommes 2025-09-12 12:40 p.m.@NEW4RK there’s your deadline
NEW4RK 2025-09-12 12:41 p.m.
will be collecting tn hopefully
NEW4RKwill be collecting tn hopefully
bommes 2025-09-12 12:42 p.m.
cool, keep us updated in here
krm 2025-09-12 12:45 p.m.
since i’m still supervising judge in this case i’ll release @billy (disabled account) for 48 hours to pay the amount
cc@p. @NEW4RK
cc
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-12 01:41 p.m.
10-4
NEW4RK 2025-09-12 01:52 p.m.@bommes i have received the moolah
psychoIoglca1 2025-09-12 01:52 p.m.@bommes @krm 
bommes 2025-09-12 01:56 p.m.
Hallelujah
billy (disabled account) 2025-09-12 02:01 p.m. 
bommes 2025-09-12 03:21 p.m.@Prothonotary's Office this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice after the payment has been made in full. Please archive.
krabz used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-13 04:29 p.m.
Initial transcript w/ images failed. Retrying without the images..(edited)
krabz 2025-09-13 04:30 p.m.
Base64 storage of images be like
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-13 04:30 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1416521474746880071 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-18 03:27 a.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Volume X [A]krabz 2025-09-27 07:50 p.m.
a
Exported 1451 messages